|
Author
|
Topic: EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed - Science Under Attack
|
tesla
Member (Idle past 1619 days) Posts: 1199 Joined: 12-22-2007
|
|
Message 38 of 438 (444413)
12-29-2007 10:57 AM
|
Reply to: Message 37 by Taz
12-28-2007 7:51 PM
|
|
Re: My Personal Reaction
what about existance, taz? to make existance a valid discussion, we must assert that it has a reason for debate in the scientific community. can you assert, that in physics, understanding elements is the reason for the science? and that by asking where the elements came from has established the big bang theory? and that by asking where existance fits is not against scientific enquiry, since it would be a debate based on science of what is, and attemtping to discover through scientific logic, in what way elements asserted "being"? Edited by tesla, : elaberated
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is ~parmenides
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 37 by Taz, posted 12-28-2007 7:51 PM | | Taz has not replied |
|
tesla
Member (Idle past 1619 days) Posts: 1199 Joined: 12-22-2007
|
|
|
Message 44 of 438 (444444)
12-29-2007 1:45 PM
|
Reply to: Message 43 by Modulous
12-29-2007 1:32 PM
|
|
Re: My Personal Reaction
creationism that implies motives to a devine being is not science, its religeon. science has avoided attempting to explain the very thing that religeon is based on: existance. anyone on this thread care to debate existance on the basis of science?
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is ~parmenides
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 43 by Modulous, posted 12-29-2007 1:32 PM | | Modulous has replied |
|
tesla
Member (Idle past 1619 days) Posts: 1199 Joined: 12-22-2007
|
|
|
Message 47 of 438 (444452)
12-29-2007 1:55 PM
|
Reply to: Message 45 by nator
12-29-2007 1:51 PM
|
|
Re: OK, enough already
lol sorry dont have one. ill try to improve.
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is ~parmenides
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 45 by nator, posted 12-29-2007 1:51 PM | | nator has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 51 by nator, posted 12-29-2007 2:33 PM | | tesla has replied |
|
tesla
Member (Idle past 1619 days) Posts: 1199 Joined: 12-22-2007
|
|
|
Message 48 of 438 (444453)
12-29-2007 1:57 PM
|
Reply to: Message 46 by Modulous
12-29-2007 1:53 PM
|
|
Re: My Personal Reaction
tried, the topic is awaiting a "great debate" but its relative to intelligent design in a way.
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is ~parmenides
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 46 by Modulous, posted 12-29-2007 1:53 PM | | Modulous has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 49 by Modulous, posted 12-29-2007 2:13 PM | | tesla has replied |
|
tesla
Member (Idle past 1619 days) Posts: 1199 Joined: 12-22-2007
|
|
|
Message 50 of 438 (444465)
12-29-2007 2:16 PM
|
Reply to: Message 49 by Modulous
12-29-2007 2:13 PM
|
|
Re: My Personal Reaction
ok
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is ~parmenides
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 49 by Modulous, posted 12-29-2007 2:13 PM | | Modulous has not replied |
|
tesla
Member (Idle past 1619 days) Posts: 1199 Joined: 12-22-2007
|
|
|
Message 52 of 438 (444473)
12-29-2007 2:41 PM
|
Reply to: Message 51 by nator
12-29-2007 2:33 PM
|
|
Re: OK, enough already
no, in order to make an online game work on a shared dial up with available funds was to use windows 98 , the 98 winproxy is full of holes and allows the program to work online shareing a dail up connection without a router. long story..a any rate the win 98 program only has minimal programs, and to my dismay, no spellcheck.
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is ~parmenides
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 51 by nator, posted 12-29-2007 2:33 PM | | nator has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 53 by Percy, posted 12-29-2007 4:20 PM | | tesla has replied |
|
tesla
Member (Idle past 1619 days) Posts: 1199 Joined: 12-22-2007
|
|
|
Message 54 of 438 (444492)
12-29-2007 4:35 PM
|
Reply to: Message 53 by Percy
12-29-2007 4:20 PM
|
|
Re: OK, enough already
in the inevitable case of random spatter by the negligence in the understood quantum levels of configuration and enhancement and religious dribble involved in supercalifragilisticexpialidocious, the case of the non-spelling fool has been resolved! thanks Percy =)
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is ~parmenides
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 53 by Percy, posted 12-29-2007 4:20 PM | | Percy has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 56 by Percy, posted 12-29-2007 5:15 PM | | tesla has not replied |
|
tesla
Member (Idle past 1619 days) Posts: 1199 Joined: 12-22-2007
|
|
|
Message 63 of 438 (444691)
12-30-2007 12:15 PM
|
Reply to: Message 62 by jar
12-30-2007 11:25 AM
|
|
Re: My Personal Reaction
What is the difference between God and some external designer? -jar that would depend on how you define God. let me propose that God is in effect: existence. this would not rule out that the origin of life on the planet couldn't have been from a hydrogen based life form from the planet boobaloob who was just curios what would happen if he took a crap on a planet that had the potential to support life.
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is ~parmenides
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 62 by jar, posted 12-30-2007 11:25 AM | | jar has not replied |
|
tesla
Member (Idle past 1619 days) Posts: 1199 Joined: 12-22-2007
|
|
|
Message 65 of 438 (444693)
12-30-2007 12:35 PM
|
Reply to: Message 64 by sidelined
12-30-2007 12:33 PM
|
|
Re: My Personal Reaction
EXACTLY 
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is ~parmenides
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 64 by sidelined, posted 12-30-2007 12:33 PM | | sidelined has replied |
|
tesla
Member (Idle past 1619 days) Posts: 1199 Joined: 12-22-2007
|
|
|
Message 67 of 438 (444696)
12-30-2007 12:41 PM
|
Reply to: Message 66 by sidelined
12-30-2007 12:38 PM
|
|
Re: My Personal Reaction
it wouldn't be a "substitution" it would be a definition. which is what drew me to this site, and is why i still await my "great debate". in the mean time: define "i am" Edited by tesla, : No reason given.
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is ~parmenides
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 66 by sidelined, posted 12-30-2007 12:38 PM | | sidelined has replied |
|
tesla
Member (Idle past 1619 days) Posts: 1199 Joined: 12-22-2007
|
|
|
Message 69 of 438 (444702)
12-30-2007 1:15 PM
|
Reply to: Message 68 by sidelined
12-30-2007 1:11 PM
|
|
Re: My Personal Reaction
i can argue this, but it would mean initializing my "great debate" what do you propose i do? should the great debate be initialized here instead?
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is ~parmenides
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 68 by sidelined, posted 12-30-2007 1:11 PM | | sidelined has replied |
|
tesla
Member (Idle past 1619 days) Posts: 1199 Joined: 12-22-2007
|
|
|
Message 71 of 438 (444705)
12-30-2007 1:24 PM
|
Reply to: Message 70 by sidelined
12-30-2007 1:22 PM
|
|
Re: My Personal Reaction
kk
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is ~parmenides
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 70 by sidelined, posted 12-30-2007 1:22 PM | | sidelined has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2