Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   if scientists accept God in science, is science destroyed?
tesla
Member (Idle past 1593 days)
Posts: 1199
Joined: 12-22-2007


Message 64 of 72 (444807)
12-30-2007 11:21 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by Organicmachination
12-30-2007 11:12 PM


Re: Assuming God: any consequences?
in the christian view: in the beginning there was only God.
by exploring existence: in the beginning there was only existence.
god=existence
moses was instructed by "i am"
"i am" = existence
therefore the concept of God=existence
i wake in the morning and i smell, feel, touch, taste, and hear all the marvelous things that exist in "existence".
your still proposing that existence could not exist, which is impossible. refer to my signature

keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is
~parmenides

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by Organicmachination, posted 12-30-2007 11:12 PM Organicmachination has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by Organicmachination, posted 12-30-2007 11:28 PM tesla has replied

tesla
Member (Idle past 1593 days)
Posts: 1199
Joined: 12-22-2007


Message 66 of 72 (444812)
12-30-2007 11:39 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by Organicmachination
12-30-2007 11:28 PM


Re: Assuming God: any consequences?
existence is not a concept its a fact. existing is not existence itself but rather: to exist, means you are a part of existence.
in the past arguing "not being" has been wholly futile and will always be futile even after the dead horse no longer is there to kick.
you will never be able to prove to me existence is not tangible, because to accept that would be accepting the possibility that i do not exist. its a futile argument.
for me to exist, there first has to be existence to exist in.

keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is
~parmenides

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Organicmachination, posted 12-30-2007 11:28 PM Organicmachination has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by Organicmachination, posted 12-30-2007 11:43 PM tesla has replied

tesla
Member (Idle past 1593 days)
Posts: 1199
Joined: 12-22-2007


Message 69 of 72 (444816)
12-30-2007 11:51 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by Organicmachination
12-30-2007 11:43 PM


Re: Assuming God: any consequences?
ok.

keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is
~parmenides

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Organicmachination, posted 12-30-2007 11:43 PM Organicmachination has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by tesla, posted 12-31-2007 12:26 AM tesla has not replied

tesla
Member (Idle past 1593 days)
Posts: 1199
Joined: 12-22-2007


Message 70 of 72 (444825)
12-31-2007 12:26 AM
Reply to: Message 69 by tesla
12-30-2007 11:51 PM


Re: Assuming God: any consequences?
i beleive that i found the answeres i was looking for in this debate.
it may be closed at any time.

keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is
~parmenides

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by tesla, posted 12-30-2007 11:51 PM tesla has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024