|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 0/23 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Safety and Effectiveness of Herbs and Pharmaceuticals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
purpledawn Member (Idle past 3477 days) Posts: 4453 From: Indiana Joined: |
Exactly!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2190 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: No, and I never said it wouldn't. The point is, you are making a pretty extreme claim that we would experience Prohibition era-style black markets if this were to happen, and I'd just like you to explain why you think this is likely. Have we seen such activity when ephedra and kava kava, or any other herbal drugs were banned, for instance?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22479 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.7 |
nator writes: Have we seen such activity when ephedra and kava kava, or any other herbal drugs were banned, for instance? You're closer to Canada then we are down here in southern NH, so I would expect this to be more common up by you, but I have a couple friends who pick up ephedra, or have friends do it for them, if they happen to visit Canada. They don't make special trips, and it isn't a black market but just for personal use. Supposedly ephedra is a prescription drug up there, but Health Canada seems to be weak at enforcement, so ephedra is widely available. But a ban on herbs pending FDA approval seems extremely unlikely. Even a change allowing FDA regulation of herbs seems extremely unlikely. The US is very libertarian regarding many aspects of health care. Did you know homeopaths in Arizona can perform surgery? --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
macaroniandcheese  Suspended Member (Idle past 3948 days) Posts: 4258 Joined: |
Have we seen such activity when ephedra and kava kava, or any other herbal drugs were banned, for instance?
ephedra hasn't been banned as far as i know in general, just in diet supplements. i bought some from drugstore.com last year. it's an otc asthma drug, i think.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22479 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.7 |
Yeah, Primatene is one, it also contains guaifenesin, don't know if that matters. Anyone know how the amount of ephedrine in asthma pills like Primatene compares to the amount in the diet pills they used to sell?
--Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Granny Magda Member Posts: 2462 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 3.8 |
Percy writes: The US is very libertarian regarding many aspects of health care. Did you know homeopaths in Arizona can perform surgery? No, I didn't know that. That is unbelievably shocking. Homoeopathy is total bunkum. I assume that they don't use homoeopathic anaesthetics. Mutate and Survive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
macaroniandcheese  Suspended Member (Idle past 3948 days) Posts: 4258 Joined: |
that may more be a function of having a large indigenous population, than libertarianism, i think. i'd have to look into similar laws in the other southwest and northcentral states. and i'm way too lazy to do that. but it's something to consider.
Edited by brennakimi, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
purpledawn Member (Idle past 3477 days) Posts: 4453 From: Indiana Joined: |
If one takes the position that herbal medicines are to be fully tested before marketing; then the implication is that to fulfill this mission, should the decision come down, all herbal medicines would need to be taken off the market until fully tested.
Prohibition is only an example of a past decision that didn't go as well as planned. We have no idea what would develop if all herbal medicines were banned until fully tested. (That means that those that pass the test get returned according to prescribed protocols.) Political leaders have to take into account the impact such a decision would have on society, the economy, and their careers. So my point since Message 21 is that saying all herbal drugs should be tested before marketing is rather a mute point since they are already out. We can say anything new should be tested before marketing, but for herbal drugs that are already out; the government will have to devise a plan with the least impact on society and the economy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Granny Magda Member Posts: 2462 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 3.8 |
HI Dawn,
purpledawn writes: If one takes the position that herbal medicines are to be fully tested before marketing; then the implication is that to fulfill this mission, should the decision come down, all herbal medicines would need to be taken off the market until fully tested. Not at all. there are other ways than to introduce an overnight ban. The usual solution in these situations, where legitimate businesses must change their practices, is to set a date when the legislation comes into force. A date is announced, say, 4 years on, and the suppliers must comply with the new rules by that date, just as is happening right now with EU legislation against keeping battery chickens. Many herbs have already been tested anyway.I still think that the comparison with prohibition is ridiculous. Prohibition was inspired by pious moralising as much as public health. If the case is made properly, I think that people will understand that legislation is for their own good. purpledawn writes: Political leaders have to take into account the impact such a decision would have on society, the economy, and their careers. Society - People would be better able to make informed decisions about their healthcare. Good science would be promoted. Disasters where people fail to take real medicines in favour of quack cures might be prevented. All sounds pretty good to me.Economy - There certainly is a lot of money made out of alternative therapies, but that still only represents a very small percentage of the total economy, in US or Europe. The effect would be minimal. Even if there is a negative economic effect, it would be worth it, in order to prevent unethical people making money by exploiting the desperate and gullible. Besides, I can actually envisage a positive effect on the herbalism sector. Plenty of people avoid herbalists, because they know that many of their claims are unproven. If the whole business became evidence based, it would make a much more attractive proposition. Politicians Careers - I'm assuming that you don't really believe that a politician should back away from worthwhile legislation for the sake of his career. That would be despicable. Slimy self-serving politicians can be a barrier to effective government of all kinds when they become obsessed with covering their arses. The point is to persuade them that regulation is worthwhile, and that as many people support it as oppose it. purpledawn writes: So my point since Message 21 is that saying all herbal drugs should be tested before marketing is rather a mute point since they are already out. So if a problem already exists, there is no point legislating against it? I fail to see any logic in that.
purpledawn writes: We can say anything new should be tested before marketing, but for herbal drugs that are already out; the government will have to devise a plan with the least impact on society and the economy. Agreed. There is no point being overly bullish about this issue. Better that it is handled sensitively, especially since most of the people who sell herbs are well meaning. But the business of selling unproven cures to often very ill people, is immoral. It should be stopped, even if that proves problematic. Mutate and Survive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
purpledawn Member (Idle past 3477 days) Posts: 4453 From: Indiana Joined: |
quote:This is like playing a game of telephone, but on the computer. How in the world do you come up with that question relative to everything I've said in this thread since Message 17?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Granny Magda Member Posts: 2462 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 3.8 |
purpledawn writes: This is like playing a game of telephone, but on the computer. Got to admit, I had to look that one up. We call that game "Chinese whispers" on this side of the pond. I apologise if I took your comment out of context, but I am a little perplexed as to why, if you support regulation of herbals, you keep stressing potential problems with it. Just to be clear, I'm not advocating banning herbals, only regulating them. I would only ban herbs that prove to be dangerous, and outlaw the sale of herbs by means of unsubstantiated therapeutic claims. Mutate and Survive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
purpledawn Member (Idle past 3477 days) Posts: 4453 From: Indiana Joined: |
Then we are not in disagreement concerning regulation of herbal medicines. Good to know.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2190 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
Do you agree that the only way we can actually know if any drug or treatment or therapy is safe and effective is through scientific, controlled double-blind testing?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
purpledawn Member (Idle past 3477 days) Posts: 4453 From: Indiana Joined: |
I agree that any product made available to the general public for consumption should be tested and shown safe and effective for its proposed use. Safe meaning that the benefits, when used properly, outweigh the risks.
To the best of my knowledge the randomized controlled trials are the best system we have for this task. The double-blind trials are better for avoiding bias, but whether double-blind is the only way, I don't know.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
subbie Member (Idle past 1275 days) Posts: 3509 Joined: |
I agree that any product made available to the general public for consumption should be tested and shown safe and effective for its proposed use. I don't think it's any legitimate use of governmental power to prevent anyone from taking anything for their health, welfare and happiness that they wish to. Caveat emptor! A fool and his money will soon be parted, and no effort on the part of the government will stop this law of nature. Let it be so. Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024