quote:
Originally posted by lbhandli:
Recently I've been reading up a bit on this fellow on Sci-Fi channel who claims to be a medium. I watched a bit the other night and it seemed to me that he was simply following common cold reading tactics and it amused me that he was gaining such popularity. In other cases recently my father-in-law mentioned how a particular co-worker wanted to discuss the Loch Ness Monster with him as well as other paranormal phenomenon.
What is the attraction of pseudoscience to people? How do people find such tales worthy of serious attention? I really am fascinated on this and would love to hear some ideas.
As a good social scientist I want to place the responsibility on class and education, but I'm not sure that is enough--any ideas?
Larry
Interesting question. I also used to lament this kind of thing as I saw it growing among my acquaintances during my college years and twenties especially. It seemed to me the world was in pretty bad shape if educated people -- I'm thinking of university-educated people -- were taking such phenomena as astrology and pyramid power and seances and shamanistic explorations seriously.
But later I became a believer in the supernatural myself. Started with a belief in a generic supernatural God, included all forms of occultic and paranormal phenomena as possible at least. Began accepting what people told me about their encounters with strange phenomena. All kinds of tales came out of hiding since I was now receptive to them. Eventually I ended up a "fundamentalist" Christian and regard most of those phenomena as dangerous and deceptive and devoutly to be shunned.
Why do so many accept this kind of thing? Much of it is no doubt fraudulent, much is also merely wishful, but there is a certain amount that is real. Most of the people I knew who got involved in these things did not believe in any religion, though I'm not sure what the connection is if there is one.
I now think some people have a genuine intuition that there is "something more" than this materialistic world we live in these days and are longing to have it made real and believable. But some do just naturally intuit the supernatural too and believe in it very simply. As I said, I now believe most of this is dangerous so it is sad to see psychic and shamanistic practices multiplying around us. Now what interests me more is why scientists get distressed over these things. They don't really challenge science after all.
The Loch Ness monster? I don't know, maybe he's symbolic of this denied Other World, which is often intuited only in rare "glimpses" just like the monster. That one I don't really know how to explain.
[This message has been edited by Faith (edited 11-01-2001).]