You admit, in other words, that your theory is unfalsifiable, a dogma about which there can be "no doubt".
The best scientific theories are unfalsifiable. Popper's falsificationism is unfalsifiable.
This means that rulerarianism is not scientific, it is a religion.
There is no factual basis for the use of falsifiability to distinguish science from religion. It is folklore, though admittedly it is folklore that many scientists find convenient to accept.
There are clear distinctions between science and non-science, but falsifiability is not one of them.
Incidently, we are way off topic for this thread, so I don't expect to further respond on this side issue.
Let's end the political smears