Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,453 Year: 3,710/9,624 Month: 581/974 Week: 194/276 Day: 34/34 Hour: 14/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What constitutes Intelligent design?
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 27 of 61 (448999)
01-15-2008 10:45 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by sidelined
01-07-2008 10:49 PM


Rube Golberg machines
Rube Goldberg machine - Wikipedia
quote:
A Rube Goldberg machine is a fabulously overengineered apparatus that humorously performs a very simple task in very indirect and convoluted fashion (thus absurdly violating the principle of parsimony).
In my opinion, any Rube Goldberg machine would be a product of intelligent design. Whether you would call it good design is another matter.
If you have a RG design that can't be built, that would seem to be a bad design.
If you have a RG design that can be built, but does not work reasonably well or at all, that would seem to be a less bad design.
If you have a RG design that can be built and actually does the intended function reasonably well - Good design or bad design? Depending on how you look at it. It could be either or perhaps both at the same time.
That's one thing that has always bothered me, about the intelligent design concept. It's easy to come up with an intelligent design. Implementing that design is a whole nother trick.
Moose

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by sidelined, posted 01-07-2008 10:49 PM sidelined has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024