There are several possible future experiments that challange conventional Western religious beliefs regarding the 'miracle of life' and the 'special' status of humans in creation:
1) Successful human cloning
Nature clones too. I don't really see that as being phenomenal.
2) Successful creation of life from non-life
What? That has never, ever happened. I assume you are going to cite the Urey/Miller experiment, but no life ever came from non-life. At most they synthesized some non-living amino acids. But it takes all 20 amino acids just to make one, single protein. They were a long, long way off.
3) Successful breeding of human and chimpanzee/bononbo
Concentrating on 3), would this be sufficent to demonstrate our 'obvious' family ties with our cousins? Would this be rather convincing evidence for humans and chimps being of one 'kind'? I would answer yes, but how would our creationists react to this news? Or would they simply deny the possibility of the succes of such an experiment?
I'm not a creationist, but I deny the current paradigm of evolution. Should this be a possibility, it would not support that one came from the other. At most, it would support that the DNA sequences are similar enough to allow an offspring. I would be more concerned over the moral implications than anything else.
“There is something which unites magic and applied science while separating both from the 'wisdom' of earlier ages. For the wise men of old the cardinal problem had been how to conform the soul to objective reality, and the solution had been knowledge, self-discipline, and virtue. For magic and applied science alike the problem is how to subdue reality to the wishes of men: the solution is a technique; and both, in the practice of this technique, are ready to do things hitherto regarded as disgusting and impious" -C.S. Lewis