seriously rrhain, characterizing your opponent as fantasizing about raping babies and felating canines is the very definition of ad hominem. not to mention a clear misrepresentation of NJ, nevermind his argument. two wrongs do not make a right.
I agree that characterizing NJ as actually
fantasizing about this stuff is too far, but the point remains that NJ, in
every thread about homosexuality, has done this. He equates homosexuality to pedophilia, rape, and bestiality in every thread he participates in where the morality or legality of homosexuality or gay marriage are discussed. He also makes offensive claims like "the LAW says that homosexuality is an abomination" and refuses to support or retract his statement despite multiple posters demanding it.
Personally, since NJ seems to like to use such threads as an outlet for his hate speech and doesnt like to debate honestly about such topics, I think he should be barred from discussions on homosexuality. He has the right to his beliefs and opinions, but he's not bringing any form of debate to the table, just offensive hate speech.
Every time a fundy breaks the laws of thermodynamics, Schroedinger probably kills his cat.
™ Version 4.2