|
Author
|
Topic: General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 14.0
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
|
Message 2 of 134 (446372)
01-05-2008 11:04 PM
|
|
|
PD
Re: your recent ruling.
Okay, Dubya's cheerleader, what is your plan? Furthermore, do you believe you are even remotely acting like an adult? Care to explain your seemingly INSANE position? From OB, Message 181. Trash talk? If not, please define trash talk.
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 18 of 134 (446609)
01-06-2008 6:12 PM
|
|
|
Just out of curiosity
Despite Sinequanon's topic, "Spiders are intelligent", he has agreed to provide a definition of intelligence only if a moderator agrees to adjudicate. What that would involve, I don't know. Would anyone be interested?
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 20 by AdminNWR, posted 01-06-2008 6:32 PM | | molbiogirl has replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
Re: admin buz
Brenna, you're right. If Buz is going to be even-handed then he should warn everyone who uses the word. Let's see, as of today, that would be 76 times in the last month alone.
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
Arach.
Fair enough. I spent 12 years onstage (standup) in NYC. What can I say? Sometimes I go after a heckler. But I agree. I crossed the line.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 3 by arachnophilia, posted 01-06-2008 12:18 AM | | arachnophilia has not replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 40 of 134 (447010)
01-07-2008 7:02 PM
|
Reply to: Message 20 by AdminNWR
01-06-2008 6:32 PM
|
|
Soliciting the opinion of other admins.
In a sense, his opening post implicitly defines "intelligence" to be the same as "instinct". While leaving both undefined. It seems to me that in the past, when asked for clarification of an OP, other posters have been encouraged to comply. Providing a definition of intelligence/instinct isn't that much of a stretch. Does anyone agree?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 20 by AdminNWR, posted 01-06-2008 6:32 PM | | AdminNWR has seen this message but not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 43 by nwr, posted 01-07-2008 8:09 PM | | molbiogirl has replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 44 of 134 (447084)
01-08-2008 12:51 AM
|
Reply to: Message 43 by nwr
01-07-2008 8:09 PM
|
|
Re: Soliciting the opinion of other admins.
From Distinguishing Design Message 63.
You have titled your topic "Distinguishing 'designs'" - why don't you define the very many different meanings of 'design'? Seems I'm not the only one with this sort of question.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 43 by nwr, posted 01-07-2008 8:09 PM | | nwr has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 45 by nwr, posted 01-08-2008 12:58 AM | | molbiogirl has replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 46 of 134 (447097)
01-08-2008 2:00 AM
|
Reply to: Message 45 by nwr
01-08-2008 12:58 AM
|
|
Re: Soliciting the opinion of other admins.
With all due respect, nwr, horse piddle. If "intelligence"/"instinct" has no scientific currency, why, praytell, is it bandied about so?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 45 by nwr, posted 01-08-2008 12:58 AM | | nwr has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 47 by nwr, posted 01-08-2008 8:43 AM | | molbiogirl has not replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 59 of 134 (448588)
01-14-2008 5:29 AM
|
Reply to: Message 58 by anglagard
01-14-2008 4:48 AM
|
|
Re: So What's Wrong With Sustained Irony?
I think it is a sad day for this forum when such a time honored expression of talent is subject to censorship. I agree, Angla. I see no reason that thread should have been closed. And I certainly see no reason to admonish Jar like that.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 58 by anglagard, posted 01-14-2008 4:48 AM | | anglagard has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 60 by cavediver, posted 01-14-2008 7:49 AM | | molbiogirl has not replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 68 of 134 (448992)
01-15-2008 9:50 PM
|
|
|
Little help, please.
If I want to express my opinion that life is digital first and chemical second on this threat I should be allowed to without having to suffer your literary yeast infection. Message 30 I have asked HM to stick to the topic. He has refused and has resorted to ad hominem. If someone would issue him a warning, I would appreciate it. Edited by molbiogirl, : title
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 69 by AdminPD, posted 01-16-2008 7:05 AM | | molbiogirl has replied | | | Message 73 by Fosdick, posted 01-16-2008 7:03 PM | | molbiogirl has not replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 70 of 134 (449111)
01-16-2008 5:25 PM
|
Reply to: Message 69 by AdminPD
01-16-2008 7:05 AM
|
|
Re: Little help, please.
That's what happens when you don't write a good opening post. I disagree. Having quickly browsed several of the books in The Book Nook, my OP is typical. HM is the problem. Hoot always acts trollish in my threads. Teen4christ had no problem taking his questions to the appropriate thread. And nwr is very nearly the perfect poster.
It would be nice if you provided your own review of the book following the admin msg. Again. Of the first 10 books posted, only 2 offered reviews. If someone is interested in reading the book and posting their thoughts, they are more than welcome to do so.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 69 by AdminPD, posted 01-16-2008 7:05 AM | | AdminPD has not replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 107 of 134 (450120)
01-20-2008 9:26 PM
|
|
|
Amen's got quite a mouth on him these days.
Message 39.
Thats what natural scientist believe... and I really consider them to be a pain in the ass, since they are selfish pointless debaters. A person is ignorant to you, because he doesn't feel like dealing with your bullshit? seriously TN, your a selfish debater and a waste of time. Message 37.
eh, where the fuck is your proof? 2) you seem to be a science jock, always counting how many people who, in your case, probably really didn't want to deal with your bullshit and just said "fuck it" Dunno if he's crossed the line. Gettin close, tho.
|
™ Version 4.2