quote:
As I wrote, basically PaulK's response is some variation of #2 and #3.
No, it isn't.
quote:
2.) Possibly he will stress that none of them believe things identical to the disciples of Jesus therefore they are not proofs of the claims of Jesus.
I said nothing about the writer's beliefs at all. Nor did I insist on exact identity of beleif. What I did point out is that none of the non-Christian documents referenced actually offers much of an account of Jesus' words and deeds that would allow us to judge the accuracy of the Gospels!
So I did not use 2) at all.
quote:
3.) Possibly he'll object that no one was there in "real time" writing down at the very moment what Jesus was saying. Therefore bad memories have erased all the true things said by Jesus forever.
I made no requirement to be written down at the very moment Jesus was speaking. The original comment referred to "true contemporary" accounts and I have not gone beyond that. Jay clearly intended to assert that I would tighten the requirements to unreasonably exclude documents - and that did not happen at all (indeed any reasonable person would see that it is just another of Jay's smears).