anglagard writes:
I disagree with Adminnemooseus concerning the closing of the thread
Message 24. Not so much because the thread was closed but rather the reasons behind such actions.
Adminnemooseus writes:
I also suggest that Jar, in general, be much more selective in his starting of new topics. I've had thoughts that his new topics permissions should be suspended.
I believe such an attack upon the person, who however mischievously promotes, sustained irony is completely unwarranted.
Quoting my entire
topic closing message:
Adminnemooseus writes:
Subtitle: Adminnemooseus impression - This is a mighty dubious topic
-----
Going to close it down.
I also suggest that Jar, in general, be much more selective in his starting of new topics. I've had thoughts that his new topics permissions should be suspended.
If anyone wished to present a case why it should be reopened, to to the "Thread Reopen Requests" topic, link below.
Other discussion - Go to the "General discussion..." topic, link also below.
Adminnemooseus
The reason I closed the topic was stated by the subtitle.
My comment about Jar's topic startings was a more general impression, and possibly wrong. That impression has preceded the current topic in question. It wasn't that I was saying Jar didn't also start topics of high merit.
Had Jar presented his case in the "Thread Reopen Requests" topic intead of starting a
new version, I or another admin would have reopened the topic. It would have been nice had Jar presented that new version information in the original topic. I guess I don't tolerate "cryptic" well.
Adminnemooseus
Added by edit: Upon further (re)review I observe that, regardless of where the original topic started, it sure seems to have "gone to hell" down thread - seemingly going far astray of Jar's topic intentions. Probably enough reason in itself, to close the topic.
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Change ID.
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above "Added by edit".