Anyone else notice this pattern?

It isn't a positive for the uneducated. I was pointing out that it is a positive for those who benefit from those who are uneducated. Right down the line. It isn't about you getting not so cheap shoes. It is about being paid slave wages to make these shoes. They get paid 5cents to make them and you pay $75 to wear them. Where is the proffit going? The scriptures(biblical) come under both forms. In most cases, where accounts are concerned, we are looking at historical records. However, it is impossible to apply one given set of standards and expect to accurately interpret the bible.
They key it would seem is to try and obtain as much historical and supporting data on the scripture in question. Chances are, you will find sufficient information(validated) through past research to obtain a credible interpretation. ha ha ha. C'mon? They are winding you up and you are falling for it.

Would you dispute the belief that adam and eve ate from the tree of knowledge, especially from someone who truly believes in an all powerful god and that the bible was inspired by god?

What idiot came up with that scenerio? I'll make it a bit easier. What if the question had been, "where did good and evil originate? What would be your answer? Would you be able to prove their biblical answer incorrect using the scientific methods you seem to worship. "Thou shalt have no other god but me!"

I am pointing out to you, Ringo that you don't know everything about your chosen subject, either. Your sloppy thinking on biblical matters is usually consistent with sloppy thinking in matters scientific. At last, honesty! Why is acquiring knowledge of good and evil an important point? There isn't a point! It's just a statement.

I've had a similar suggestion before but I prefer this one. Leave it with me and I'll see what I can do. I like a challenge.

Exactly and yet the evolutionists point out that creationists beliefs are in fact misconceptions when they are not. They are strongly held beliefs.This has been the whole point that when a strongly held belief is held, the individual could not see it as a misconception. We all have strong justifications for our beliefs from - mum told me, to god told me, to science proves it. I'll keep trying Edited by Heinrik, : No reason given.

Precisely, you can't. You would have to voice a concept that someone else disagrees with and then they would have to point out your misconception. Then your dilemma would be........ Great question. I'm stumped. I will give it some thought

I watched the clip and also checked out the full dvd by eternal productions and I believe it is taken out of context, both in the clip and in the minds of the non-creationists'. As it's shown, it is amusing.

No it's never a good thing for those who lack the skills but it's a really good thing for the economy, for proffits, for shareholders, for cheaper merchandise, having people to do the menial work that more educated would not stoop to do. Lots of positives for many.
There are two sides to every coin. I thought it was the other way around as defined in post 1. [qs=nator] Posts: 12672
Registered: 12-09-2001 Message 1 of 219
12-29-2007 10:57 AM--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, I have noticed that many of the Creationists on this board have, shall we say, less than stellar writing skills compared to the science-minded folks.
Sure, there are a few exceptions, but I would guess that well more than two thirds of the Creationists who have ever posted here simply write very poorly.Their grammar and punctuation ranges from average to downright awful, they frequently fail to break their posts into paragraphs, and their ability to express ideas, sentence structure and word usage doesn't give one an impression of their having done very well in high school English.On a related note, my husband frequents a message board populated by people who work in higher education. Not surprisingly, most posters there write well, and express themselves clearly and often eloquently.Every so often a controversial subject such as Affirmative Action comes up in discussion, and he has noticed that of those people who pop up to write posts condemning it, many of them possess markedly poor writing skills.So, why does everyone think this pattern exists?
Edited by Heinrik, : No reason given.

Aren't you both off topic?

And how have you reasoned that the strongly held belief is indeed FALSE?

Funny how you label me a creationist. What made you jump to that conclusion? I honestly find it hilarious. Why do you evolutionists take it so personal?

Read it again. Someone suggested to me to be sure I understand the post before I reply. I'm just passing it on to you. You may not understand this, but I have been addressing the discrepancies (in the original post) from start to finish. I never lose sight of the premise. In this thread of 'patterns concerning human beings' I found some of the facts to be true but percieved from superiority and a condescending manner.One misconception I am arguing is that one needs these skills to communicate or express a point of view. If I had said blatantly that this was wrong, I would have got all the arguments and evidence and got nowhere. This did happen anyway.
The responses were rock solid. No way could I penetrate that miconception. So I approached it in a different way. A very simple way that all participants could understand. I decided to try to prove this point in black and white. This is what I did.I sent a post completely mispelled and no punctuation, only one person responded. Later I sent exactly the same post but this time it was corrected. This time it sparked a flurry of debate which is absolutely wonderful and continuing still.So you see, my friend, the percieved 'uneducated post' was ignored by the educated. It was written off by the more intelligent crowd. If Dameeva had not picked up on my point, it would have been dead and buried before it begun.The evidence, in black and white is in this thread. It cannot be missed. It clearly shows the onus is on the educated to make the effort to listen and understand those who cannot improve their standards to meet yours. You are asking the impossible of them but it is so possible for you.

Do you think creationists are also inept in their own chosen field?Edited by Admin, : Fix dBCode.

Everything you are saying is making it even funnier. It's because it is meant to be a documentary and meant to be taken seriously and they do. ha ha ha ha I also find it so hilarious because both sides take it so seriously in one way or another.ha ha ha.I don't belong to either side and the hilarity has lifted my spirit! ha ha ha There is no way I can take either of you seriously here. No offense intended.The whole thing is a joke, except for the judging, offense given and recieved, inability to see anothers' reasoning, inability to understand anothers' thinking patterns, inability to communicate on a different level other than their own, inability to see the effects they have on others, insulting phrases and comments and patting each other on the back for a job well done. Give us five! We beat them. We won!Yes, but for all these it would be extrememly hilarious. However to close on a humourous observation, no-one sees themselves.