Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,876 Year: 4,133/9,624 Month: 1,004/974 Week: 331/286 Day: 52/40 Hour: 3/3


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Education and Creation/Evolution ⇒

20 years of the Creation/ID science curriculum

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   20 years of the Creation/ID science curriculum
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4217 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 8 of 305 (451371)
01-27-2008 1:43 PM 		Reply to: Message 5 by Modulous
01-27-2008 9:57 AM

Re: From the Wedge strategy
Modulous
They are running a bit behind schedule, but they were planning (by 2018)
​
To see intelligent design theory as the dominant perspective in science.
To see design theory application in specific fields, including molecular biology, biochemistry, paleontology, physics and cosmology in the natural sciences, psychology, ethics, politics, theology and philosophy in the humanities; to see its innuence in the fine arts.
To see design theory permeate our religious, cultural, moral and political life.
​
Or welcome to the year 1418
​
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other
This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Modulous, posted 01-27-2008 9:57 AM Modulous has not replied
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4217 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 133 of 305 (454443)
02-07-2008 12:51 AM 		Reply to: Message 130 by Cold Foreign Object
02-06-2008 10:46 PM

Truth has been ignored, that is why we need to reverse the scourge of Atheist ideology called Darwinism.
​
What truth?
​
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other
This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 02-06-2008 10:46 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4217 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 196 of 305 (454828)
02-08-2008 7:51 PM 		Reply to: Message 187 by Beretta
02-08-2008 9:07 AM

Re: Old evolutionist's tales
Beretta
Id proposes that natural causes may not be the only explanation possible for life on this earth but it does not attempt to get into who or what the creative intelligence may be because the identity of the designer is not part of science -that would be part of a theological debate.The point is not to exclude the potentially correct answer by limiting the definition of science to material causes and passing it off as fact since it may shut out investigation into the truth of what actually did produce life.
​
Much like the identity of the creator being out of the domain of science, so would things like voodoo and charms be out of the realm of scientific investigation.
​
The point is that ID cannot be scientifically tested anymore than any other pseudoscience (ie: astrology, alchemy) can. To be treated as science one must be able to show that the postulate is feasible (ie relativity, evolution, plate tectonics etc.).
​
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other
This message is a reply to:
 Message 187 by Beretta, posted 02-08-2008 9:07 AM Beretta has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 224 by Beretta, posted 02-12-2008 4:20 AM bluescat48 has replied
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4217 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 215 of 305 (455273)
02-11-2008 6:56 PM 		Reply to: Message 211 by Cold Foreign Object
02-11-2008 6:09 PM

cold foreign object
Correction: Darwinism has been imposed on public class rooms. The same is rabidly supported by all Atheists. ID seeks to loosen the stranglehold and re-introduce Science back into the schools.
Trixie
Since Behe admits that ID isn't science as science is currently defined, do you want to change the definition of science to get it in or do you want to see the work done that will make ID fit under the current definition?
​
ID is not Science! It is creationism attempting to use scientific terminology to confuse the issue and get this pseudoscience into science classes.
​
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other
This message is a reply to:
 Message 211 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 02-11-2008 6:09 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4217 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 231 of 305 (455432)
02-12-2008 12:36 PM 		Reply to: Message 224 by Beretta
02-12-2008 4:20 AM

Re: Old evolutionist's tales
beretta
So in this case, evolution is the type of pseudoscience you must be talking about -the evidence is against it.As for ID, the evidence matches the theory which is why it is infinately more satisfying a theory.
The postulate IS feasible -Helloooo!
​
Show me one piece of evidence that shows ID is correct.
​
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other
This message is a reply to:
 Message 224 by Beretta, posted 02-12-2008 4:20 AM Beretta has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024