randman writes:
why I think ID will eventually be taught in schools and the law overturned...
1. Any scientific theory that must rely on the law to maintain it's dominance is on very weak ground. We saw that with the Scopes trial and creationism and now we are seeing it with evolutionism. The very fact evos used the law at Dover to seek to silence their critics is a death-knell in the long run, imo.
As others have pointed out, the parents brought lawsuit, not scientists.
But one thing hasn't been pointed out. Of all the advanced scientific countries, there's only one that has huge swathes of
creationists type bible punchers, and it's no coincidence that that is the one which has an evolution/I.D. education related trial.
It's all about religion, Randman. Less religiosity in a country will mean less I.D. support, and the most religious country in the west is where the modern movement comes from. The decision at the trial was that I.D. is a religious movement, and you can easily find quotes from its theologians like William Dembski to back that up.
Religions characteristically rely on the indoctrination of children to perpetuate themselves, which is why I.D. aims at the classrooms, and claims, like other forms of creationism, that the evidence based science taught at present is indoctrination. But religion, when it takes on real science done with scientific method will always lose in the long run, and always has.