Imo, this argument is disingenious. We all know within evo circles, the
idea of ID is highly charged and likely to set off a firestorm of persecution and protest among evos towards anyone daring to publish explicitly ID papers, though it seems that is happening nonetheless. I think what happened at the Smithsonian is ample evidence and example of such a witchhunt, and incidentally, the media and Congressional review came to the same conclusion. I realize you guys will disagree, but it's worth noting a lot of people that are not creationists or IDers agree it was a witchunt and wrong.
This exact logic was tried by the defense in the Dover trial to explain why there was no papers and it was soundly rejected.
Some others who have read the transcripts might need to help me with my memory but I even believe that the defense was rebuked when trying use the smithsonian issue as rhetoric.
You cannot say that Congressional review came to the conclusion that there was a witch hunt at the smithsonian when all of 2 congressmen were the ones responsible for the biased report. 2 who have direct ties to the ID/creo movement.
Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)