Evolutionary superiority

You asked me to provide an example which I took literally to mean an example of a true belief I held that I could explain as true based on rational feelings, life experiences and logic............. .............. phew, I'm glad I got that wrong. I hadn't a clue how I could explain my belief but I wanted to show off my evolutionary superiorority. Damn. Thwarted again.
regards Edited by paula rose, : bad spelling

You appear to be the only one who keeps seeing these fantasies. I'm beginning to worry about you. I'm sure Hill Billy wasn't fantasizing about Trixie crying. I'm sure Hill Billy knows she is much stronger than that. Did you see how Trixie kicked my arse when I was heinrik? Don't you go worrying your head over us females. We are from strong breeding stock.

The belief I put forward is not actually about the material world but about humanity itself that resides in the physical world.We are feeling, thinking, conscious beings experienced through a living body. I believe all three incorpoated create our life experiences. Could this belief be proved/disproved?

I would be happy to answer your questions if you are sincere and willing to consider my answers. However, would this be on topic for this thread?

yes your post is long and I tried to take it all in. However I was drawn to this statement again and again............ .........................If feelings and beliefs are worthless, then are you saying the only value we have is our intelligence?I cannot agree. I believe your feelings and beliefs are invaluable, if only to you, which they are not.I think you have assumed I am a creationists but I don't restrict myself with labels. regards

Ooops. I did assume you assumed I was a creationist like many others. You didn't actually mean me personally. This 'you' is meant in the singular but I will read 'you' as in the plural from here on. Thanks for that. It was bugging me. OK you didn't actually say what you meant. I believe my life experiences are verifiable, physical, evidence that only I can know, but maybe others can relate to.This thread is a result of a challenge to prove my belief without using scientific or religious dogma. I won't use it and I won't dispute it because it is irrelevent to the intention.Hope this clarifies the position. regards Paula Rose.

We meet again. I hope you know you are feeding a troll. Watch out for the troll guards. They might say you are one by assiciation. However, The evidence would be verifiable with others having the same experiences or very similar and correlating the experiences to draw a conclusion. How many would we need?

I think you may have meant it this way around as Dr inadequate's post had nothing to do with the topic.