Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,356 Year: 3,613/9,624 Month: 484/974 Week: 97/276 Day: 25/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   why is the lack of "fur" positive Progression for humans?
TheTruth
Member (Idle past 5883 days)
Posts: 60
Joined: 02-11-2008


Message 42 of 202 (455821)
02-13-2008 9:55 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by LouieP
01-15-2008 12:27 PM


or it could be because God used intelligent disign and made us that way

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by LouieP, posted 01-15-2008 12:27 PM LouieP has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by TheTruth, posted 02-13-2008 10:04 PM TheTruth has not replied

  
TheTruth
Member (Idle past 5883 days)
Posts: 60
Joined: 02-11-2008


Message 43 of 202 (455824)
02-13-2008 10:04 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by TheTruth
02-13-2008 9:55 PM


besides the fact if we evolved then we start reevolving in the womb am i right but funny thing we have little to no hair and if we evolved next generations would have less and less hair but that isn't true look at history dark ages long hair then we cut it hippies long hair the we cut it new age long hair it is a stretch to say that we evolved out of fur not historical finds show any evidence of excess body hair in previous years

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by TheTruth, posted 02-13-2008 9:55 PM TheTruth has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Vacate, posted 02-14-2008 12:22 AM TheTruth has replied
 Message 46 by Wounded King, posted 02-14-2008 12:17 PM TheTruth has replied

  
TheTruth
Member (Idle past 5883 days)
Posts: 60
Joined: 02-11-2008


Message 45 of 202 (455885)
02-14-2008 12:10 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Vacate
02-14-2008 12:22 AM


ok the last one was a typo it was supposed to say no historical evidence so im saying never was a man a monkey man was man and monkey was monkey there may have been a cross breed im not denying that i was saying hypotheticaly in the womb a person starts in the "fish stage" and progresses to a human by the third trimester but i don't think that i think it is a human from conception

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Vacate, posted 02-14-2008 12:22 AM Vacate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by Vacate, posted 02-15-2008 12:10 AM TheTruth has not replied

  
TheTruth
Member (Idle past 5883 days)
Posts: 60
Joined: 02-11-2008


Message 47 of 202 (455915)
02-14-2008 2:32 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by Wounded King
02-14-2008 12:17 PM


ITS WAS HYPOTHETICAL PEOPLE
i meant if i know we don't eveolve in the womb we never evolved period

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Wounded King, posted 02-14-2008 12:17 PM Wounded King has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by Rahvin, posted 02-14-2008 2:53 PM TheTruth has not replied
 Message 50 by Wounded King, posted 02-15-2008 3:36 AM TheTruth has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024