Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,832 Year: 4,089/9,624 Month: 960/974 Week: 287/286 Day: 8/40 Hour: 4/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Answers Research Journal (new creation research journal)
CK
Member (Idle past 4155 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 9 of 17 (455619)
02-13-2008 4:39 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by bluescat48
02-13-2008 4:21 AM


Re: Instructions to authors
Isn't that in fact a requirement?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by bluescat48, posted 02-13-2008 4:21 AM bluescat48 has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4155 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 12 of 17 (455652)
02-13-2008 10:10 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by PMOC
02-13-2008 9:15 AM


Re: Andrew Snelling
quote:
As an aside, for those of you higher up in the academic community, is there any mechanism by which one can have his phd rescinded? Surely this kind of behaviour would violate most, if not any, ethical requirements.
As long as his proper work conforms to normal standards and he keeps his quack stuff outside of the confines of his university, it's nothing at all to do with the university - nobody will care.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by PMOC, posted 02-13-2008 9:15 AM PMOC has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by PMOC, posted 02-13-2008 10:56 AM CK has replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4155 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 14 of 17 (455673)
02-13-2008 11:26 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by PMOC
02-13-2008 10:56 AM


Re: Andrew Snelling
You'd be surprised how bent a lot of mainstream social sciences research work is (not sure about your actual sciences because we don;t mix with those types....).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by PMOC, posted 02-13-2008 10:56 AM PMOC has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4155 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 17 of 17 (456206)
02-16-2008 10:08 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by tesla
02-14-2008 9:08 PM


I agree
quote:
but by the introduction topic, it would appear that the journal will only do what i have done.
Talking complete and utter nonsense about science, at length and with no real understanding of what science is or how it's conducted?
Yes I agree, it will only be doing what you have done.
quote:
there is only one science. and only one God. and God in science does not make it a new science. it would mean God is recognized in science. and because God is true, science would have better direction based on the truth of existence.
Complete rot.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by tesla, posted 02-14-2008 9:08 PM tesla has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024