Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,458 Year: 3,715/9,624 Month: 586/974 Week: 199/276 Day: 39/34 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What is evolution?
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 7 of 122 (456236)
02-16-2008 1:52 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by subbie
02-14-2008 2:40 PM


Re: I Know
Hi subbie,
subbie writes:
In another thread, ICANT wrote
I know what evolution is.
I also know what is being preached as evolution.
Probably the number one biggest complaint most of us have about creos is that they in fact don't know what the ToE says, and usually end up arguing against a misunderstanding, rather than the real thing. I assume everyone would agree with me that it's counterproductive to argue against evolution based on what it doesn't say.
I stated: "I know what evolution is".
Simply put evolution is change.
Webster says:Evolution Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
1: one of a set of prescribed movements
2 a: a process of change in a certain direction :
unfolding b: the action or an instance of forming and giving something off :
emission c (1): a process of continuous change from a lower, simpler, or worse to a higher, more complex, or better state :
growth (2): a process of gradual and relatively peaceful social, political, and economic advance
d: something evolved
3: the process of working out or developing
4 a: the historical development of a biological group (as a race or species) :
phylogeny b: a theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modifications in successive generations; also : the process described by this theory
5: the extraction of a mathematical root
6: a process in which the whole universe is a progression of interrelated phenomena
I said: "I also know what is being preached as evolution.
Using my definition of evolution what is being preached is:
About 13+ billion years ago there was something about the size of a pea. It was very, very, very hot. It was very compact as it contained everything you see in the universe and everything you cannot see.
We can not say anything about the origin of that pea sized universe as GR breaks down at this point and Science can not tell us anything about it. Where it came from, how it formed if it came from something that had existed before, or if it came from an absence of anything.
This universe began to expand and from this time forward we have a theory that explains the changes that took place. the Big Bang Theory.
About 4.5 billion years ago the earth was formed, and it was very, very hot. It cooled to the point that life appeared from the absence of anything. Now the TOE explains how all life came from this single cell life form. We do not attempt to find out how it formed we just believe it happened.
This single cell lifeform began to change and formed multi cell lifeforms. These multi cell lifeform changed enough over time to produce every living and extinct lifeform that has ever existed on earth and exist today.
Don't ask us to produce proof of anything, because in Science nothing is a proven fact, even though we believe it. Don't ask us for evidence, we will show you what little we have then blow all kinds of smoke to fill in the millions of years between what we can present. Besides we know what we are talking about so you should just accept what we say.
Now I have sat in the pew of your church for over a year and I have listened to many messages from many different preachers and this is the message I hear preached about evolution.
So you can jump up and down and scream and shout no, no, no, all you want. That is not going to change my mind about what I see being preached.
If you want to change my mind I suggest you do as admin has tried to tell us over the last few weeks. Cut out the bickering, personal attacks, arguing and get to debating the evidence that is available concerning evolution.
I think it is a cop out when evolutionist say we only want to debate Biological evolution.
It is all evolutiion from that small pea sized universe.
subbie writes:
In any event, please tell me what you think the ToE is.
A creationist is supposed to tell an evolutionist what the ToE is when evolutionist can't agree on what it is. There is a 216 message thread here: http://EvC Forum: The Definition for the Theory of Evolution -->EvC Forum: The Definition for the Theory of Evolution
A 121 message Great Debate here: http://EvC Forum: Basic Fundamentals of THE Debate (now open to anyone) -->EvC Forum: Basic Fundamentals of THE Debate (now open to anyone)
subbie's definition:
quote:
Populations change over time, mostly due to selective pressures to which the populations are subject, which enable those offspring better adapted to the environment to reproduce at a higher rate than those which are not. This change occurs because those organisms that are better adapted tend to pass on more of their genetic make up to the next generation.
Message 5 of http://EvC Forum: The Definition for the Theory of Evolution -->EvC Forum: The Definition for the Theory of Evolution
This is a definition of Biogenesis.
RAZD http://EvC Forum: The Definition for the Theory of Evolution -->EvC Forum: The Definition for the Theory of Evolution
quote:
Evolution is the (hereditary) change in species over time.
This is the definition of Biogenesis.
Biogenesis Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
biogenesis:
1 : the development of life from preexisting life
2 : the synthesis of chemical compounds or structures in the living organism
My definition:
The Theory of Evolution is a change over time where all living things came from a pea sized universe that expanded into what we see and what we do not see today. The Big Band Theory tries to explain what happened in the material universe from T=O+ until present. The Theory of Abiogenesis tries to explain how life came into being on a lifeless planet. Once this life appeared the Theory of Biogenesis tries to explain how all living lifeforms extinct and living today came from this first or many life cells.
The beginning (origin) of the universe is a fairy tale.
The beginning (origin of life) is a fairy tale.
Remember you asked for my definition of the ToE this is it and I don't expect you to like it. But it is what it is.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by subbie, posted 02-14-2008 2:40 PM subbie has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-16-2008 2:05 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 13 of 122 (456249)
02-16-2008 3:22 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Dr Adequate
02-16-2008 2:05 PM


Re: I Know
Hi Dr.
Dr Adequate writes:
And if you know perfectly well that in English, the word "pineapple" does not indicate a marsupial, then the last of these options will be the case. You would be a liar telling a stupid lie
Remember subbie asked for my definition of the ToE.
He did not ask for the definition of evolution.
Glad to see you still in rare form preaching your garbage.
I told subbie he wouldn't like my definition and I didn't think any other evolutionist would either.
AS I said you guys can't even agree among yourselves.
You care to enlighten us with your version?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-16-2008 2:05 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Granny Magda, posted 02-16-2008 4:08 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 15 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-16-2008 4:18 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 17 of 122 (456261)
02-16-2008 4:50 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Dr Adequate
02-16-2008 4:18 PM


Re: I Know
Hi Dr,
By the way, when are you guys going to agree on whether the universe is 6,000 years old or 13,000,000,000 years old?
I never thought it was either one.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-16-2008 4:18 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 20 of 122 (456269)
02-16-2008 6:51 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Admin
02-16-2008 5:21 PM


Re: Getting on Topic
Hi Percy,
Percy writes:
The Big Bang theory of cosmology has nothing to do with evolution, not even with biology. If you don't want to accept that then you can't participate in this thread, but please feel free to propose a thread discussing why the Big Bang should be part of biology.
I get the idea if there was no Big Bang there would be no evolution to talk about.
But that is besides the point.
I was asked for my ToE definition I gave it nobody liked it. what else is new.
I gave a definition for evolution nobody mentioned it.
I gave the definition of what I heard preached as the ToE nobody mentioned it.
Message 7
TOE explains how all life came from this single cell life form. We do not attempt to find out how it formed we just believe it happened.
This single cell lifeform began to change and formed multa cell lifeforms. These multa cell lifeform changed enough over time to produce every living and extinct lifeform that has ever existed on earth and exist today.
My problem is this:
The Big Bang Theory covers everything from T=O+ until present.
ToE as defined by evolutionist here only covers biogenesis. Why is that?
If the ToE is supposed to be The Theory of Evolution it should cover all of evolution. That would cover anything that has ever evolved. Not just Biogenesis.
You do not need a ToE to study biogenesis.
Did the universe not evolve? Or was it full grown to start with?
Did the earth evolve?
Evolution simply stated is change. Change can only happen over time.
I am perfectly willing to give a definition for biogenesis that I agreered with sometime ago.
http://< !--UB EvC Forum: Evolution and the BIG LIE -->http://EvC Forum: Evolution and the BIG LIE -->EvC Forum: Evolution and the BIG LIE< !--UE-->
RAZD writes:
Biological Process #1 is the change in hereditary traits in populations from generation to generation.
Biological Process #2 is the division of a 'parent' species into two (or more) 'daughter' species.
http://< !--UB EvC Forum: Evolution and the BIG LIE -->http://EvC Forum: Evolution and the BIG LIE -->EvC Forum: Evolution and the BIG LIE< !--UE-->
RAZD writes:
What we are looking at is descent from parent populations and variation and adaptation within isolated sub-populations of species up to the point they become independent daughter populations.
So you are saying this is micro-effects and macro-effects as you put forth in Process #1 and #2.
So these independent daughter populations that don't associate with each other are still fruit flys. Nothing has changed except the way they behaved toward each other.
wiki article writes:
it was observed that the flies would mate only with others from their adapted population.
It did not say they could not mate only that they were observed not to mate.
So yes I agree so far.
Biogenesis (or evolution either one you want to call it} then is the change in heredity traits in populations from generation to generation, with the division of parent species into two (or more) 'daughter' species.
This was RAZD'S attempt to come up with a definition that creationist could accept.
Is there anything wrong with this definition that I agreered too.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Admin, posted 02-16-2008 5:21 PM Admin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by bluescat48, posted 02-16-2008 7:09 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 29 by RAZD, posted 02-16-2008 8:37 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 22 of 122 (456274)
02-16-2008 7:18 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Admin
02-16-2008 5:21 PM


Re: Getting on Topic
Hi Percy,
Percy writes:
If you're going to address the part of subbie's opening post that asked for "what is being preached" about evolution, then you also have to address the part where he says:
I thought I made it clear that what I was hearing preached was my personal opinion. It comes from what I have read over the last year and I do not plan on spending another reading it and marking every little thing that cause my mind to think the way it did.
You must remember I am looking at this from a different view than you are.
So if it is all the same to you we can drop my opinion on what is preached.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Admin, posted 02-16-2008 5:21 PM Admin has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 24 of 122 (456277)
02-16-2008 7:29 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by bluescat48
02-16-2008 7:09 PM


Re: Getting on Topic
Hi bluescat48,
bluescat48 writes:
ToE relates only to biological evolution.
So why is it called the Theory of Evolution then?
biological evolution is only one kind of evolution.
abiogenesis is a kind of evolution.
The expanding universe is a kind of evolution.
Cars have evolved.
Airplanes have evolved.
So what theory covers all this other kind of evolution?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by bluescat48, posted 02-16-2008 7:09 PM bluescat48 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by DrJones*, posted 02-16-2008 7:36 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 26 by mark24, posted 02-16-2008 7:57 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 27 by Admin, posted 02-16-2008 8:25 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 28 by Granny Magda, posted 02-16-2008 8:35 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 32 of 122 (456415)
02-17-2008 9:27 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by Percy
02-16-2008 9:09 PM


Re: Trying to Get on Topic
Hi Percy,
Percy writes:
then an evolutionist can only point out what is actually true, which is that evolution does not include the origin of life.
Before I stick my neck out too far I would like to ask a question.
Who determines this statement is true or false?
In other words what type of person would I have to produce to say that it does include the origin of life?
I would just like to know what would be acceptable before I present my evidence.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Percy, posted 02-16-2008 9:09 PM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by subbie, posted 02-17-2008 10:26 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 38 by RAZD, posted 02-18-2008 4:02 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 34 of 122 (456432)
02-18-2008 12:10 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by subbie
02-17-2008 10:26 PM


Re: Trying to Get on Topic
Hi subbie,
Did you misunderstand my question?
I asked specifically about evolution including the origin of life.
I would like to add going back further also.
I do have evidence I just want to get a clear statement as to what would be acceptable evidence.
I think I made it clear in a message to Percy I was through talking about what was being preached.
I am only concerned with supporting my definition for ToE.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by subbie, posted 02-17-2008 10:26 PM subbie has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Adminnemooseus, posted 02-18-2008 2:49 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 37 by Percy, posted 02-18-2008 8:02 AM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 36 of 122 (456461)
02-18-2008 7:46 AM


Re-My Final Post this Topic
I asked for and received clarification of what would be allowed in this topic. Message 35
In Message 1
I'm not asking you to provide any evidence for or against any theory.
No evidence required.
I'm not asking you to argue for or against it.
No argument required either way.
In fact, I'd rather you not argue against it in this thread.
No arguing against at all.
I just want you to describe what you think the ToE says.
My opinion asked for.
My opinion given Message 7
Then all kinds of arguing breaks loose.
I was admonished in Message 19 concerning my opinion.
In Message 20 I gave my definition of (evolution) (biogenesis)as I had agreed to with RAZD in another thread.
I was then given a 24 hour time out by admin. which I deserved because I had argued with an admonition.
Since I have nothing further I can add to this topic other that my definition in Message 20 I will start a new topic to discuss my opinion concerning the ToE.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 57 of 122 (466196)
05-13-2008 1:47 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by Coyote
05-13-2008 12:45 PM


Re: What is a fact?
Coyote writes:
Fact: when an observation is confirmed repeatedly and by many independent and competent observers, it can become recognized as a fact.
Just because a bunch of people agree. Does that make it a fact?
If so there are millions of competent observers who have confirmed repeatedly that there is a God. You say what was observed? Changed lives.
Just because a bunch of people agree. Does that make it a fact?
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by Coyote, posted 05-13-2008 12:45 PM Coyote has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by lyx2no, posted 05-13-2008 3:08 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 65 by Blue Jay, posted 05-13-2008 7:29 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 60 of 122 (466215)
05-13-2008 4:09 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by lyx2no
05-13-2008 3:08 PM


Re: What is a fact?
lyx2no writes:
Not even one.
I see you haven't been to church lately.
Then maybe you think those millions are delusional like I think all those that think the universe could come from an absence of anything is.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by lyx2no, posted 05-13-2008 3:08 PM lyx2no has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024