Hmm, I wish I could take that answer back. Now that I think twice about the question, it is irrational to think the Loch Ness monster exists. I, for one, do not believe the Loch Ness monster exists, but I had difficulty abandoning the argument to ignorance. Moreover, can the analogy be stretched to God(s)?
The Loch Ness monster was (is) believed to reside in Loch Ness, an area "extending approximately 37km". If there exists any supernatural entity which we can call God, would we be complacent to look in an area that stretches 37km, and determine that if God were very likely real, that they would reside in a 37km area?
I understand both have been looked for repeatedly, and no independently constructed, verifiable data has surfaced, but the analogy still leaves a sour taste in my mouth.