What could/would falsify Irreducible Complexity?

Self replication.The system that the self replicating molecules spawned from was not self replicating, itself. So the self replicating molecules could be said to be "more" alive. Of course, that requires you to use an unconventional definition of living. That seems to be your bag, baby. Redefining words so you can make some outrageous claim like you do here to say that universe is alive. Why do you do that? It looks and smells like trolling.

That's not what self replication is. or in other words: redefine them What makes it trollish is that when peope show how you are obviously and blatantly wrong, you continue to spout the same nonsense.The universe did not self replicate in the sense that self replicating molecules do. The self replicating molecules' self replication is one step closer to being living. There you go redefining agin "living" has a definition and it is not simply existing.

Did you always have other people do your homework for you?Why don't you just look it up if you don't know what it means?And here is the page on irreducible complexity since you seem to not know what that is either.

You just call it a thing. I don't get what you are asking? If it is self replicating, then after the replication, you will have two of those things. You said the universe self replicated, that would mean that we would end up with two universes. But that defeats the wole point of the "Uni" part of the word. If you want to make up your own definitions for words then you are just trolling.You are waaaaay too under-edjucated to be discussing these things with your attitude that your always right. Edited by Catholic Scientist, : No reason given.

But things just do that on their own. Take a sealed glass of water at room temp and put it in the freezer. Without any outside interactions, the water will "self evolve" into ice. The term we use for that is: freezing.In the context of the universe/Big Bang we just call it 'expanding'. You seem to think that the universe was just hanging out as a singularity for some amount of time and then something happened that made it change into what it is today. It turns out, that is not the case.Things change on their own. Take some gas concentrated in a little box, put the box in a room, and then open it. The gas will fill the room without outside interaction. It just does it all on its own, and there's a term for that too.We don't need some all encompasing term like "self evolving" to describe things that are already defined. Ditto. Then you're not talking about irreducible complexity.Why obfuscate the issue by taking an already defined concept and turning into your own little fantasy?

What's wrong with a self evolvement?