More than flesh and blood?

Larni, Would it not be more accurate to say that you observed your clients visible or audible reactions to the emotions they felt, and not the emotions themselves?I can't help pointing out that I find it extremely humorous that you misspelled both cognitive and behavioral. Well, how about what the individual actually feels? Your very thoughts or your brain activity? Well, if that activity is the actual thought itself and not a response to that thought.. I think the emotion itself is non-material, the reactions this emotion sets off can be observed there by detecting the non-material. Sorry but the actual emotion itself can not be verified directly, can it?

---

The years tell what the days never knew.

OK, I wouldn't be surprised, I seem to bat about 500.

---

The years tell what the days never knew.

Larni: Really? You say Then you say :Which, of course makes them NOT independently verifiable. We must take you at your word that you thought what you said you thought. I understand that you BELIEVE this to be true, however it remains un-verifiable.I get that you have FAITH in a nice simple world, but this is your OPINION :The possibility that it ain't that simple remains possible.Science requires independent verifiability and our thoughts and feelings remain un-verifiable from an independent standpoint. You can read my words but not my mind.

---

The years tell what the days never knew.

Larni.Come on now, does any of this apparently emotionally motivated babbling address the issue of verifiability, or the lack there of? Well...... If you mean fail to motivate you to address the issue of verifiability, or the lack there of.... You would know.

---

The years tell what the days never knew.

Larni. How do you independently verify that the thought and the activity are the same thing and the only thing? We can't even independently verify what the thought was. Yes, it seems I did. Mmm, I think I supported it. If you can't independently verify the data yet still believe the conclusion is true than that's faith, with a capitol opinion. That's nice. It's not really such a big issue for me. That may be cause I don't actually believe that the thought and the activity are the same thing and the only thing. Of course because your thoughts remain your own ( Ok, for now.) and mine are still mine I really have no way of definitively verifying if I am correct.Just like you. As I said, it don't really cause me much trouble but it can make a position difficult to support if that position requires independently verifiable data.

---

The years tell what the days never knew.

Don't take much to entertain you, does it?If you have been following so closely you would know I have already answered this question. More than once.Keep yer stick on the ice.

---

The years tell what the days never knew.

Dude! You referenced him to Kent Hovind. How do you define insult?Speaking of definitions.... How the *%$! do you earn hope? Oh, I get it, your kidding.Right?

---

The years tell what the days never knew.