You guys have helped me edit my proposition a little, so thanks for that...
Purely in terms of presenting your thoughts -
I would suggest a abstract at the beginning of your paper.
Also an introduction in which you state the purpose of your paper as at the moment it requires from the reader comprehension of the reasoning for each conclusions with no initial indication as to where the reasoning is heading (which is difficult for anyone in the case of complex arguments).
Finally make it more explicit where you are using the term 'science' to mean that which you argue it 'should' mean as opposed to that which it more commonly means (esp at the beginning of your paper where the arguments as to what it 'should' mean are not yet known by the reader)
Just advice - Take or ignore as you see fit obviously.
For what it is worth I have just posted what I think is a fair summary of your thinking to the thread in question.
Anyway - Good luck with it and hopefully "see" you around again at some point.
Edited by Straggler, : No reason given.
™ Version 4.2
