Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,781 Year: 4,038/9,624 Month: 909/974 Week: 236/286 Day: 43/109 Hour: 0/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How old are you?
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1493 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 3 of 159 (46022)
07-14-2003 8:02 PM


Old enough to know better, according to my parents.

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1493 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 100 of 159 (50964)
08-19-2003 12:43 AM
Reply to: Message 97 by defenderofthefaith
08-18-2003 4:17 AM


I'm here to stay.
Glad to hear it. (No, really.) Join the debate any time you like. Only - if you do, please make sure you've read enough of the forum to avoid the posting of any tired, refuted-a-hundred-times arguments. And if you post a new topic do try and limit your original post to at most one or two relevant points.
I mention these things because I've seen far too many creationists launch into the debate by cutting-and-pasting this.
Here's a rule of thumb - if you didn't write it yourself, we've seen it.
Ok, sorry to come down like a moderator on you - I'm not - and I do welcome you to the site. Happy hunting.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by defenderofthefaith, posted 08-18-2003 4:17 AM defenderofthefaith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by Buzsaw, posted 08-19-2003 1:46 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1493 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 102 of 159 (51139)
08-19-2003 1:55 PM
Reply to: Message 101 by Buzsaw
08-19-2003 1:46 PM


It's just that your post should not intimidate newcomers to the point that they're squeemish about using other reference material to support their personal views which they wish to communicate here, especially in the free for all forum.
Well, it was not my hope to do so - I encourage persons of all views to expound on them, in whatever mode they choose - but rather impress strongly upon a newbie that it only takes 2 seconds to search the archives to see if something has been posted already - 2 seconds that could be the difference between a great debate and more FFGfollower nonsense.
Sorry if I came off as an ass, though.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by Buzsaw, posted 08-19-2003 1:46 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1493 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 104 of 159 (51146)
08-19-2003 2:17 PM
Reply to: Message 103 by Buzsaw
08-19-2003 2:08 PM


Often when one makes a statement or claim, another challenges with something like, ".....and your proof is," or "......that's false/untrue." What is one to do? Lie down and roll over? I often choose rather to bring up a link or quote other authority to support my challenged statement or claim.
I think you've misunderstood which posts I'm talking about. I have no problem with links to stuff like Answers in Genesis in the context of a raging debate, to support a point already stated by the poster.
What I was hoping to prevent was a post along the lines of the link I had, where somebody posts a message that consists entirely of "This is proof against evilution: answersingenesis.org".
I mean, what are we supposed to debate there? You can't debate with a website any more than you can debate with a book. Books don't talk. And when we say "Um, we'd like you to post something a little more pithy" they're all like "evolutionist bias!"
Surely you've noticed this happening?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by Buzsaw, posted 08-19-2003 2:08 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by Buzsaw, posted 08-19-2003 2:32 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1493 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 107 of 159 (51162)
08-19-2003 3:57 PM
Reply to: Message 105 by Buzsaw
08-19-2003 2:19 PM


Thanks, Crashfrog, for clarification. Btw, from almost day one of my arrival, though we occasionally lock horns in spirited debate, you're one of my favorite evo counterparts here.
I appreciate the sentiment, though I can't possibly imagine why you would find that would be the case. Unless it's my disarming good looks...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by Buzsaw, posted 08-19-2003 2:19 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by Buzsaw, posted 08-26-2003 10:01 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1493 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 110 of 159 (52409)
08-26-2003 10:12 PM
Reply to: Message 109 by Buzsaw
08-26-2003 10:01 PM


Your heart seems not to have yet petrified into stone as seems to be the case with so many evos here in town.
If you say so. Quite frankly I'm a pretty hardcore evolutionist, though I'm no scientist. And it would take a literal miracle - an actual visitation from God - to make me a beliver again.
I mean, I'm willing to entertain ideas, and I'll change my mind about the evolution thing when there's an explanation that works better - but I think that's largely true of everybody else here.
If you have dreams about bringing my soul back into the fold, however, I'll have you know that I'm likely to be a pretty tough sell. I'm not trying to be proud, but rather, inform you that I have some pretty strict criteria for evidence.
Oh, and by way of returning the compliment - thanks for not being one of those creationists who flips out and tells us we're all hell-bound when the debate doesn't go their way...
[This message has been edited by crashfrog, 08-26-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Buzsaw, posted 08-26-2003 10:01 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by Pogo, posted 08-29-2003 7:58 PM crashfrog has not replied
 Message 114 by Buzsaw, posted 08-29-2003 11:00 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1493 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 117 of 159 (53025)
08-30-2003 11:25 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by Buzsaw
08-29-2003 11:00 PM


Could it be possible that what you came out of was one of the fellowships of the pseudo fold?
You know, every one of the "faithful" I talk to about my experience asks this question. "Was I really a Christian? Or was I a fake Christian?"
The question I ask them in return is, "if I couldn't tell the difference then, how can you tell the difference now? How do you know that you're a real Christian?" So far I've never gotten an answer that was better than "I just know." Of course, I just knew I was a Christian back then, and guess what? I was wrong. If I was wrong, couldn't you be wrong?
As for the evidence, not the thread for it, but many of the Biblical prophecies are simply irrefutable and have never been sensibly refuted by anyone.
I believe I'm on the record as to my feelings about "prophecy" and the problems inherent in any attempt to predict the future. These were largely figured out by the Greeks, well before the Bible.
Yah, I'm sure you'd be a tough nut to crack for Christ and Christianity as most would be here, Crashy, but hey, with God and the powerful wooing/drawing power of his mighty Spirit, anything's possible.
I'm sure it is.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by Buzsaw, posted 08-29-2003 11:00 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024