Tesla and Superweapons.

There is a HUGE difference between secret scientific knowledge and secret technology. Most of the conspiracy theories revolve around the former (which 'obviously' leads to the latter) and is pure bullshit, and never actually promoted by anyone who has a clue about the relevant science (e/m, gravity, 'electrograv')Or at least, that's what I've been paid to say CD (one-time passionate advocate of the Philedelphia Experiment )

I knew something was wrong as I wrote it, but wasn't totally sure The movie was great and I was fully into the 'science' at that time as a young teenager. A friend and I had already traced the full history of the DE-166 USS Eldridge through every copy of Janes we could order at the library. I probably read Berlitz when I was 11 or 12, and shortly after discovered my father had a copy of Thin Air (the fictional novelisation of the PE.)I must have started to lose faith through sixth form, being fed a much healthier diet of Feynman, Weinberg and Einstein. By the time I started uni I was sure it was purely mythical.

Huh? SG has defined what HE means by superweapon in HIS thread, and he has also clarified that meaning. Not really much for you to disagree with there... if I get around to a thread on supersymmetry, are you going to tell me how a butterfly expresses some really super symmetry?

As SG seems to be on weekend sabbatical... No. It was built using the latest nuclear science of the day, but it was not 'hidden' science in any way. However, the technology and engineering involved was hidden. A modern day equivalent would be the F-117 and the B2.Superweapons, as SG defines them, are supposed technologies based upon supposed science that has been developed and kept secret by the military; weapons based upon Tesla's electrograv, Einstein's Unfied Field Theory, Brown's Lifetr technology, and of course, science gleaned from the contents of Hnager 18...

Note to Randman: Please do not reply to this message. If you'd like to discuss whose quantum views are truly mainstream please propose a new thread. --Admin I'm sorry, what? The theory is Quantum *Electrodynamics*, or QED as we call it, and it just happens to be the most successful theory science has ever developed. Oh, just don't give up with this idiocy, do you? Tell you what... here's a big favour from me to you. This is a lecture on basic quantum mechanics given by the guy who taught me what QM was really about - you've probably not heard of him, but he's part of the Feynman, Gell-Mann, Glashow, Weinberg crew - i.e. he's rather BIG in quantum theory. You'll have to make do with a video... Sidney Coleman: Quantum mechanics in your faceI strongly advise anyone else interested in this area to watch the video - stick with it, it's a bit technical in places, it's over an hour long, but you WILL learn something.Edited by Admin, : Add note at top.

And your evidence is...

quote:

---

He talked about experiments that suggested particles with fractional charges of an electron...

---

My emphasis and that's predicting quarks??? There really are no limits to the tenuous bullshit you're prepared to believe...