Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,805 Year: 4,062/9,624 Month: 933/974 Week: 260/286 Day: 21/46 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   100 Categories of Evidence Against Noah’s Flood
obvious Child
Member (Idle past 4142 days)
Posts: 661
Joined: 08-17-2006


Message 13 of 96 (463058)
04-11-2008 6:47 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by LucyTheApe
04-11-2008 9:53 AM


No they aren't.
Space Today Online - Solar System - Planet Earth - History of Human Writing
And very few flood stories actually have anything common other then water. The amount, size, location, motivation, what the people did, etc all are different.
There is no such things as a global story of a singular flood across civilizations through time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by LucyTheApe, posted 04-11-2008 9:53 AM LucyTheApe has not replied

obvious Child
Member (Idle past 4142 days)
Posts: 661
Joined: 08-17-2006


Message 56 of 96 (463361)
04-15-2008 3:51 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by Buzsaw
04-15-2008 9:40 AM


Re: Input Response
quote:
In October 2006 Science Daily publicized a study led by Arizona State University staff entitled "Giant Insects Might Reign If Only There Was More Oxygen In The Air." The article claims, "The delicate lady bug in your garden could be frighteningly large if only there was a greater concentration of oxygen in the air, a new study concludes. The study adds support to the theory that some insects were much larger during the late Paleozoic period because they had a much richer oxygen supply, said the study's lead author Alexander Kaiser. The Paleozoic period...was a time of huge and abundant plant life and rather large insects -- dragonflies had two-and-a-half-foot wing spans, for example. The air's oxygen content was 35% during this period, compared to the 21% we breathe now, Kaiser said." This research concurs with the biblical model of the early earth.
Interestingly enough, I made a challenge to the local creationists on another site dealing with such a problem. The moron argued that since Co2 was higher, it was the reason that arthropods got so big. I then challenged him to provide the chemical equations for ATP production with Co2 as the input gas rather then O2. It's been DAYS since he posted.
How does that even SUGGEST anything related to a Biblical model of the early Earth? Furthermore, why isn't everything bigger due to more oxygen? Why didn't humans grow much larger with more oxygen to fuel larger bodies?
Creationists will say anything to support their belief regardless of if it makes sense or not.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Buzsaw, posted 04-15-2008 9:40 AM Buzsaw has not replied

obvious Child
Member (Idle past 4142 days)
Posts: 661
Joined: 08-17-2006


Message 78 of 96 (463547)
04-18-2008 4:15 AM
Reply to: Message 71 by Buzsaw
04-17-2008 9:24 PM


Re: Pause
But how about when it goes against physics and basic math?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by Buzsaw, posted 04-17-2008 9:24 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024