Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,400 Year: 3,657/9,624 Month: 528/974 Week: 141/276 Day: 15/23 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Criticizing neo-Darwinism
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 256 of 309 (463681)
04-19-2008 1:04 AM
Reply to: Message 253 by randman
04-18-2008 11:13 PM


Randman's reluctance to supply a link
Not grabbing at anything. You know full well what the study is so don't make false accusations.....the simple truth is this site is censored according to the perception of the owner.
So cut the crap. If you have some integrity, link the paper and discuss the findings. If not, don't hide behind false accusations of hiding behind anything. you know full well I cannot link the study without being banned and may well be banned for merely mentioning it, despite it being a peer-reviewed paper by evos.
My "bolding".
I think the above is absolute nonsense. But if you truly think that link is so dangerous to you membership, how about e-mailing it to me? I'll take a look at it, and probably post it for you. Or I will tell you and all why the link can't be posted.
Please include a link to this message in any e-mail. Otherwise I might have problems tracking what the e-mail is relevant to.
No replies to this message by anyone, other than via e-mail.
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 253 by randman, posted 04-18-2008 11:13 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 257 by randman, posted 04-19-2008 1:11 AM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024