Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,332 Year: 3,589/9,624 Month: 460/974 Week: 73/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Importance of the First Amendment
Serdna
Junior Member (Idle past 5836 days)
Posts: 8
From: Florida
Joined: 04-21-2008


Message 5 of 59 (463915)
04-21-2008 10:18 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Otto Tellick
02-28-2008 12:14 AM


"Also, public schools can present information about Creationism and ID, in the context of studying topics like history, politics and other "social studies", and perhaps in areas like folklore, mythology, and comparative religion (e.g. a review of creation stories from all cultures) -- that is, to study them as social phenomena." Quote From Otto Tellick
(Sorry in advance for the copy and past quoting but I am new to this forum and am still learning how to navigate)
But doesn't this completely undermine the teaching of religion to students from their lives outside of school including, but no limited to, church and biblical studies from family members or religious leaders. If you do not want to learn about God or the bible thats fine and its your right as an american to do so, however when schools are teaching evolution as absolute fact, and not theory which is what it is, and at the same introducing religion and peoples most deeply held beliefs as a superstitious social crutch which is quaint, obsolete and ultimately hindering to "human progress", it creates an environment for these students in which any religious or spiritual thought is quickly discarded by the student even if they have religious influences outside of school.
The evolutionary theory is not a religious belief, it is a scientific theory, and is therefore is given free passage in public schools curriculum even though it is essentially undermining any belief in a god or religion, and I believe that this is a breach of the first amendment. ALthough it is not banning religious practice it is forcing children to learn and accept the evolutionary theory as fact voiding any religious beliefs leaving parents with little recourse.
At the same time I do not believe that students should be required to take a course on intelligent design or any specific faith. Instead I believe that religious teachings as well as controversial scientific theories which attempt to disprove those beliefs i.e evolution, big bang etc. should be offered to students at their and their parents/guardians choice.
Basically I believe that mandating the teaching of any religion in public schools is wrong and should instead be a journey that the student embarks on of his or her will. At the same time teachings such as the evolutionary theory which attempt to undermine any religious beliefs also fall into the same category and therefore the mandating of these teachings undercut our most base ideals as americans, Freedom.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Otto Tellick, posted 02-28-2008 12:14 AM Otto Tellick has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Blue Jay, posted 04-21-2008 10:37 PM Serdna has replied
 Message 8 by Rahvin, posted 04-22-2008 12:37 AM Serdna has not replied
 Message 12 by PaulK, posted 04-22-2008 2:33 AM Serdna has not replied
 Message 16 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-22-2008 12:04 PM Serdna has not replied
 Message 19 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-22-2008 1:47 PM Serdna has replied
 Message 20 by Phalanx, posted 04-22-2008 3:13 PM Serdna has not replied

  
Serdna
Junior Member (Idle past 5836 days)
Posts: 8
From: Florida
Joined: 04-21-2008


Message 7 of 59 (463919)
04-22-2008 12:00 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Blue Jay
04-21-2008 10:37 PM


Re: The False Dichotomy
Bluejay writes:
Be careful with this, Serdna, because most science teachers don't even mention creationism, especially at the elementary thru high school level of education.
I never said that science teachers were the ones talking about religion and honestly the thought had not crossed my mind. In fact I was speaking more in reference to history classes, which retell the stories of the past during times that were dominated by religious beliefs. Events such as the crusades and stories of Spain's conquistadores who brutally killed and enslaved native americans during the colonization of the americas. However I in no way fault the teachers for teaching on these subjects, in fact they are I find them to be extremely interesting. Instead I was simply using it as an example of how religion in public schools is being presented to students in a negative light. Top that off with all thats happening in the world right know, specifically in reference to the middle east conflict, and its not hard to see why so many people are turning away from religion.
Bluejay writes:
Furthermore, you've introduced a false dichotomy that is perpetuated by religions everywhere: you don't have to choose either science or religion, unless your religion specifically dictates that you cannot believe in science. Science cannot, and does not attempt to, provide commentary on the existence or non-existence of God or anything else that is supernatural
Wow, I dont even know where you got the assumption that I believe science is the devil, I assume it is from your preconceived notions of people who believe in God, and I certainly hope you will think twice before jumping to such conclusions again, as that is the kind of thinking that hinders an open dialogue on controversial issues.
Of course I believe in science, I am currently taking two science classes at college and I don't cover my ears and yell whenever someone mentions evolution or says the words "millions of years ago". Science is as much a creation of God as the grass in your front yard, and we can use it to further understand the world around us as well as its Creator. However when science is aimed at disproving the existence of God, then I do believe it to a waste of the preciously short time we that we have.
quote:
In fact, quite the opposite: ID/creationism is very much a grand conspiracy with the express intent of undermining the scientific theory of evolution.
Unfortunately your timeline seems to be a bit off as the belief of a created earth has been around for slightly longer that Darwin or his Theory of Evolution. And once again I would ask that you and everyone else refrain from making such blindly ignorant statements.
As for your claims of my fearing science because its "evil intentions" you are wrong again. I do not fear science and your mental preset of thinking that simply because I disagree with the theory of evolution I must be an alarmist in a wooden house in some backwards town in the deep south who burns copies of the Da Vinci, and The Origin of Species so I can cook some beans over the fire, well frankly its a bit insulting.
Bluejay writes:
The word "theory" is held in very high esteem in science: there is no higher office to which a scientific concept can be promoted. Please take some time to learn about how the word "theory" is used in science, and realize that it is very different from what your parents and your minister think it is.
Theory as defined by Webster's Dictionary "1: the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another"
Just because your using facts in your research doesn't mean that every conclusion you draw from it is also a fact. Also on a side note, my parents are not religious and the only interaction I have had with my pastor in the couple years has been running into him at target and making small talk, but by now I am no longer surprised by reading a comment like that from you. However I am still disappointed and I also hope that you would try and be as civilized when discussing a topic of such importance.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Blue Jay, posted 04-21-2008 10:37 PM Blue Jay has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Taz, posted 04-22-2008 12:41 AM Serdna has not replied
 Message 11 by Blue Jay, posted 04-22-2008 1:11 AM Serdna has not replied
 Message 13 by Rrhain, posted 04-22-2008 2:47 AM Serdna has not replied
 Message 14 by Granny Magda, posted 04-22-2008 7:56 AM Serdna has not replied
 Message 15 by Rahvin, posted 04-22-2008 11:32 AM Serdna has replied
 Message 59 by steeley42, posted 06-29-2008 6:15 PM Serdna has not replied

  
Serdna
Junior Member (Idle past 5836 days)
Posts: 8
From: Florida
Joined: 04-21-2008


Message 17 of 59 (463968)
04-22-2008 12:05 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Rahvin
04-22-2008 11:32 AM


Re: The False Dichotomy
Your position seems to be that we should gloss over or sugar-coat historical facts (or scientific facts) that might offend a person's religious beliefs. But the cold truth is that objective facts will often contradict subjective beliefs, and giving those subjective beliefs some sort of free pass is identical to letting children believe in Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy. If a belief is contradicted by objective evidence, purposefully avoiding the subject does nothing mroe than promote ignorance.
I do not see how anyone could misinterpret my words to such a degree. I do not claim that that we should be trying to "sugar-coat" the history of religion, I simply offer up my opinion that this should not be the only way that religion is presented to students as it undermines religiously held beliefs. I believe we should teach on the subjects such as the crusades as it is an important part of history.
Also the I find the fact that you would compare major world religions to the tooth-fairy disturbing.
Unfortunately, since I am a full time student working a full time job I do not have time to address all of your replies, however I will do my best to do so throughout the coming days, I would ask however that these replies stick to the topic of discussion and not focus on the fact that I used a run on sentence or the dictionary.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Rahvin, posted 04-22-2008 11:32 AM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Rahvin, posted 04-22-2008 12:20 PM Serdna has not replied

  
Serdna
Junior Member (Idle past 5836 days)
Posts: 8
From: Florida
Joined: 04-21-2008


Message 21 of 59 (464020)
04-22-2008 7:22 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Dr Adequate
04-22-2008 1:47 PM


First of all I just wanted to make a brief apology to Bluejay, as I feel that I may have made my response a bit too directed at him instead of at the subject as it should be. Secondly I would like applaud him and everyone else that does their best to make these discussions as civilized and intellectually beneficial as possible.
Here's a broad outline of evolutionary thought:
All the evidence (and there's a great deal of evidence) is consistent with the premise that all terrestrial species evolved from a few forms or one, over billions of years, in accordance with the theory of evolution, i.e the laws and facts of genetics, such as mutation, recombination, genetic drift, lateral gene transfer, and the laws and facts of genetics.
Now, here's a statement of religious belief. You may have heard of it, it's called the Apostle's Creed:
I believe in God, the Father Almighty, the Creator of heaven and earth, and in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord: Who was conceived of the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried. He descended into hell. The third day He arose again from the dead. He ascended into heaven and sits at the right hand of God the Father Almighty, whence He shall come to judge the living and the dead. I believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy catholic church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and life everlasting. Amen.
Can you see any conflict between them? No, me neither. 'Cos they're talking about comletely different things. Nor can hundreds of millions of people who have no problem with both statements:
The origins of the apostles creed, which you have cited, are still unsure. However it is generally agreed on that It was not written by the apostles of Jesus as once believed. It is basically a revised version of what is commonly referred to as the "old roman creed". It was used initially during the rise of christianity in rome as well as the rest of the world. Because of the rapid expansion of christianity it was becoming increasingly difficult to maintain uniformity throughout the church.In order to remedy this, church leaders used the "old roman creed" in order to lay a basic outline of what the christians of that day believed. It was later revised around 700A.D. into what we know today as the Apostles Creed. We have to realize that this was used during a time in history when people generally did not question whether or not there was a god, but rather which faith and religion had the real one, or in some cases which had the most powerful one. As a result there was not a large necessity for explaining the origin of the world as it was generally accepted that it was a god or group of gods, the question instead was which one did it.
It is also important to recognize that this was a basic summary of the early christian beliefs and that it in no way limits what christianity teaches.
If you don't believe me then read a history book, if you don't have one then I suggest you check out these websites.
Overview of Christian creeds and beliefs
The Apostles' Creed
I will also give reference to how Christianity and the bible conflicts with the theory of evolution since it seems pretty obvious that that was what you were trying to prove.
Please keep in mind that this post is not an attempt to disprove the theory of evolution, but instead it is to prove that it is in conflict with the bible what many christians believe.
One of the most basic teachings of most christian faiths is that the earth was created in perfect balance and that the sin that the sin of man, originating from Adam, let to the downfall of creation including death. Obviously death is an essential part of the theory of evolution, however since it claims that humans evolved much later in the evolutionary time line after the death of innumerable living organisms. Hopefully you can see how these two time lines don't sync up. This as well as the order of creation accounted in the book of Genesis which also goes against what is largely accepted as plausible by science. Which means either or the theory of evolution was wrong, or the infallible, omnipotent God of the bible was wrong and thereby voiding all subsequent biblical entries as not trustworthy because if He is wrong about something so simple as an order of events then what else did He "get wrong".
These are just two examples of conflict with evolution with only one of the many religions in the world. I am not making the argument that evolution is wrong, instead I am making the argument that the evolutionary theory and the bible/christian faith are in conflict with each other. If you would like to see some more information I suggest visiting the following websites, as well as doing some research yourself.
The page you were looking for doesn't exist (404)
Error 404 - Not found
Some of you point to the catholic church and the fact that it does not take an official position on evolution and how many respected members and leaders of the catholic church have come out and publicly endorsed the theory of evolution. In response to this I would say that I cannot say why it has taken this course of action, and as a non-catholic I can say that it does not affect me or the majority of christians in america who do not follow the catholic church, keep in mind there was a split between the Catholic church and protestants who disagreed with many of its teachings. Also it is an institution run by human beings(although based on the words and teachings of God) and is thereby subject to corruption as well as human error. If I had to guess as to the reason behind Catholic churches position I would assume that it is because they foresee evolution as the eventual victor against Intelligent design in the public's mind, however this is purely speculative and irrelevant as their decisions do not affect my faith nor the truth of the bible either way.
Once again, I ask that you PLEASE keep in mind that this post is a response to claims that the christian faith, as well as the bible, are not in conflict and the theory of evolution. I am NOT attempting to prove that the evolutionary theory is wrong and I would ask also that you please read all of my post before replying as it seems to be a habit for some of you to take my words out of context.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-22-2008 1:47 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by platypus, posted 04-22-2008 9:04 PM Serdna has not replied
 Message 23 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-22-2008 9:30 PM Serdna has replied
 Message 32 by PaulK, posted 04-23-2008 4:05 AM Serdna has replied

  
Serdna
Junior Member (Idle past 5836 days)
Posts: 8
From: Florida
Joined: 04-21-2008


Message 24 of 59 (464033)
04-23-2008 12:50 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by Dr Adequate
04-22-2008 9:30 PM


Here's a question for you. In the Bible, people always think with their hearts. The word "brain", in fact, does not occur anywhere in the Bible.
Which of these options should you follow:
(1) Abandon your faith because this "voids all subsequent biblical entries".
(2) Decide that this is a metaphor or figure of speech that need not be taken literally.
(3) Demand that science teachers should stop teaching about neuroscience and about how the function of the heart is to pump the blood, on the grounds that it would breach the First Amendment for a biblical literalist to have his faith in biblical literalism shaken by a public school teacher.
You are putting words straight into my mouth. I never called for teachers to remove or add anything from their curriculum in any way and I certainly do not think that we should force teachers to teach on creationism. I do think it is wrong that the students and parents are forced to agree with this by forcing the student to put pen to paper and say this is fact no matter what their beliefs. Nor should they be forced to take any actions that violate their beliefs as long as it does not interfere with the rights of others.
Yes. None of this invalidates my point that there are religious beliefs, including such beliefs in the Father, the Son, the Holy Spirit, the Resurection, Heaven, Hell, et cetera which are not in the least in contradiction with the theory of evolution. Science does not undermine "any" religious beliefs, it undermines those religious beliefs that science happens to prove wrong.
Whether or not what you believe is right or wrong, according to science or history, should have no bearing on this.
As a country we do not force people to take actions that go against their beliefs, as long as it does not cause harm or violate the rights of others. We don't force students who are vegans to eat meat, although they certainly are a minority. They are permitted to bring their own lunches and some schools go as far as to offer a vegetarian menu.
The government has a system for deciding whether or not to officially recognize a religion, and once that religion is recognized we should do our best not to interfere or hinder its practice, provided that it does not interfere with other citizens rights, and schools should do their best to make accommodations for students with religious beliefs.
If you are a hindu you should not be forced to choose between dissecting a cow heart or getting an F.
I also believe that muslim students should be allowed to step out of a classroom for prayer as their religion dictates that they do so 5 times a day at certain times of the day. They should not however be allowed to do so in the middle of the classroom during a lesson because this interferes significantly with the other student's education.
In this same way we should not force anyone to say that something they believe to be true is false, or vice versa. I would simply suggest that you allow the student or students be allowed to go to another room and have a study period while the subject that the student finds offensive is taught, or at the very least be excused from any sort of exam which forces the student to write or declare something that is contrary to what they believe.
In the case of public schools, I would say that if the school is not willing, or not able, to make appropriate accommodations then the government should step in.
Which proves that science does not contradict "any" religion, just the sects that incorporate being wrong about science into their dogma.
Then in your own admittance of this you have helped me make my point. Perhaps I should not have used the word "any", however it does not change the point that I am trying to make which is that we should not be forcing students, nor any citizen of the United States for that matter to do or say anything that goes against their religion or beliefs.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-22-2008 9:30 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Taz, posted 04-23-2008 12:57 AM Serdna has not replied
 Message 26 by Blue Jay, posted 04-23-2008 1:10 AM Serdna has not replied
 Message 27 by DrJones*, posted 04-23-2008 1:35 AM Serdna has replied
 Message 29 by platypus, posted 04-23-2008 2:02 AM Serdna has replied
 Message 34 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-23-2008 10:18 AM Serdna has not replied

  
Serdna
Junior Member (Idle past 5836 days)
Posts: 8
From: Florida
Joined: 04-21-2008


Message 28 of 59 (464042)
04-23-2008 1:59 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by DrJones*
04-23-2008 1:35 AM


So if I beleive that 2+2 =5 I should get a free pass in math?
If you can provide reasonable support and evidence for the fact that your governmentally recognized religion is in contradiction with math, then yes. However I do not foresee that happening as getting the government to recognize a religion takes a bit more than filling out some paper work and writing "Math is bad" under "List your religion's beliefs here".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by DrJones*, posted 04-23-2008 1:35 AM DrJones* has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by DrJones*, posted 04-23-2008 4:48 AM Serdna has not replied
 Message 58 by steeley42, posted 05-06-2008 9:56 PM Serdna has not replied

  
Serdna
Junior Member (Idle past 5836 days)
Posts: 8
From: Florida
Joined: 04-21-2008


Message 30 of 59 (464046)
04-23-2008 2:36 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by platypus
04-23-2008 2:02 AM


Wait, wait. A student stepping out of class or not dissecting a cow is completely different from refusing to be taught a certain curricula. In your examples, other options can be given. The Hindu can dissect another animal. The Muslim can stay after school for an additional lesson. These student do not object to the material itself, they just want the ability to practice their religion. Nothing in evolution prevents a creationist from practicing any part of their religion.
Im not saying that the hindu or islamic belief systems contradict the evolutionary theory and honestly I don't know enough about their beliefs to confidently comment on them. Instead I am using these as examples of what is and should be tolerated in public institutions such as schools and that the same tolerance must also be applied to potentially offensive teachings whatever they may be.
Please back this up with specifically what might be said in a biology class that is directly in conflict with a religious belief.
Like I said I am not confident enough to comment on what other religions believe, however if you want to know how the theory of evolution contradicts with the bible and what many christians believe then you should read my earlier post which is number 21 in the list of posts.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by platypus, posted 04-23-2008 2:02 AM platypus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by platypus, posted 04-23-2008 2:59 AM Serdna has not replied

  
Serdna
Junior Member (Idle past 5836 days)
Posts: 8
From: Florida
Joined: 04-21-2008


Message 35 of 59 (464120)
04-23-2008 1:53 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by PaulK
04-23-2008 4:05 AM


One of the most basic teachings of most christian faiths is that the earth was created in perfect balance and that the sin that the sin of man, originating from Adam, let to the downfall of creation including death.
No, that's not a "basic" teaching of Christianity. Most Christians reject it - only Young Earth Creationists endorse it.
Your assumption that that belief in the original sin as the event that brought death into the world is something that only a tiny minority of christians believe is false and downright ridiculous. Listed Below are several bible verses that unequivocally support the belief of an original sin and the subsequent fall of creation through death and decay.
I have cited only two of the several bible verses that support this belief. The links to newadvent.org will take you to the catholic bible verses, and the linke to biblegateway.com is a link to the king james version of the bible, which is reffered to as "the bible without notes". If you wish to learn more about the history of the King James Version and why it held in such high esteem by the entire christian community then I suggest visiting the following sites.
http://www.thegethsemanechurch.com/...e_true_Word_of_God.doc
(Unfortunately this link will only download an html version of the website but if you would rather you can simply type the key words from the link into a search engine or simply use the other link)
http://www.av1611.org/kjv/kjvhist.html
Catholic Bible Translations
HOLY BIBLE: 1 Corinthians 15
HOLY BIBLE: Romans 5
King James Version Bible Translations
Romans 5 KJV - Therefore being justified by faith, we - Bible Gateway;
(start at verse 21 if you want to see exactly what im talking about, but to prevent claims that I am taking the bible out of context I posted a link to the entire chapter)
1 Corinthians 15 - The Resurrection of Christ - Now, - Bible Gateway
(once again what I am refering to is first mentioned in verse 21 but I have posted a link to the entire chapter)
The link below is will give you general information as well as more biblical support of the belief in the original sin. It is also from a respected catholic website since that seems to hold more authority with some of you for some reason.
CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Original Sin

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by PaulK, posted 04-23-2008 4:05 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by PaulK, posted 04-23-2008 2:19 PM Serdna has not replied
 Message 37 by Blue Jay, posted 04-23-2008 2:35 PM Serdna has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024