Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,352 Year: 3,609/9,624 Month: 480/974 Week: 93/276 Day: 21/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Mystery of Stop-Codons....
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2660 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 6 of 14 (463894)
04-21-2008 6:49 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Blue Jay
04-21-2008 3:33 PM


Each different tRNA in an organism would have to be encoded by a different gene, each of which would either arise independently or as a variation of the first tRNA gene. Either way, they would have arisen one by one.
I certainly don't know anything about tRNA evolution, but here is what I found:
The transfer RNA (tRNA) multigene family comprises 20 amino acid-accepting groups, many of which contain isoacceptors. The addition of isoacceptors to the tRNA repertoire was critical to establishing the genetic code, yet the origin of isoacceptors remains largely unexplored. A model of tRNA evolution, termed tRNA gene recruitment, was formulated. It proposes that a tRNA gene can be recruited from one isoaccepting group to another by a point mutation that concurrently changes tRNA amino acid identity and messenger RNA coupling capacity.
http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=2178528
IOW, a single change in the genetic code of one tRNA = a different tRNA. Perhaps this was one of the evolutionary mechanisms.
And I found this on wiki:
In certain proteins, non-standard amino acids are substituted for standard stop codons, depending upon associated signal sequences in the messenger RNA: UGA can code for selenocysteine and UAG can code for pyrrolysine as discussed in the relevant articles. Selenocysteine is now viewed as the 21st amino acid, and pyrrolysine is viewed as the 22nd. A detailed description of variations in the genetic code can be found at the NCBI web site.
The fact that non-standard amino acids are inserted in proteins (rather than "stopping" these proteins) is intriguing. It means that a stop codon can "attract" a tRNA that is aminoacylated (i.e. carrying an amino acid).
Also. Some vertebrate codons act as invertebrate stop codons.
AGA and AGG (AGR) are arginine codons in the universal genetic code. These codons are read as serine or are used as stop codons in metazoan mitochondria.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/p3518139p478jt0j/
Again, as with the non-standard amino acids, this suggests that some stop codons act as ordinary codons.
Edited by molbiogirl, : sp

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Blue Jay, posted 04-21-2008 3:33 PM Blue Jay has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Blue Jay, posted 04-21-2008 7:25 PM molbiogirl has not replied
 Message 9 by Dr Jack, posted 04-22-2008 6:40 AM molbiogirl has replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2660 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 11 of 14 (463990)
04-22-2008 1:42 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Dr Jack
04-22-2008 6:40 AM


While some groups of single-celled organisms & organelles do use a slightly different coding system to that used in most prokaryotes and (IIRC) all eukaryotes, it is not the case that veterbrate and invertebrate codings are different.
Mind you. I did all of 30 minutes worth of scholar.googling.
The ARG vertebrate codon acts as a invertebrate stop codon or a SER codon (in the metazoan mitochondria) in the paper I cited.
I didn't mean to suggest that ALL stop codons are different in metazoans. Which is why I used the word "some".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Dr Jack, posted 04-22-2008 6:40 AM Dr Jack has not replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2660 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 14 of 14 (464746)
04-29-2008 12:05 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by semilanceata
04-28-2008 8:49 AM


Re: What came first the tRNA or the Stop?
It's important to understand that the "universal code" evolved from earlier, simpler codes.
The genetic code, understood as the specific assignment of amino acids to nucleotide triplets, might have preceded the existence of translation.
Amino acids were utilized as cofactors by ribozymes in a metabolically complex RNA world. Specific charging ribozymes linked amino acids to corresponding RNA handles, which could basepair with different ribozymes, via an anticodon hairpin, and so deliver the cofactor to the ribozyme.
Growing of the ”handle’ into a presumptive tRNA was possible while function was retained and modified throughout.
A stereochemical relation between some amino acids and cognate anticodons/codons is likely to have been important in the earliest assignments.
Trends in Genetics
Volume 15, Issue 6, 1 June 1999, Pages 223-229
Here.
It has also been suggested that the code and the AA biosynthesis co-evolved.
A coherent pattern of evolution will be seen to emerge in which addition of a new amino acid to the code typically followed path extension, tRNA diversification to a new acceptor, expansion in synthetase specificity and selection for each synthesized protein.
The coevolution hypothesis (Wong, 1975, 1976) requires that precursors among coded amino acids entered the code before their products. In this section, the time of entry of each amino acid into the code has been estimated from the number of reactions in its biosynthetic pathway. A phased pattern of synthesis emerges, in the sense that physicochemically divergent amino acids appear at divergent stages of code evolution. This has significant implications for code evolution and the origin of life.
Evolution of the genetic code
Brian K. Davis
Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology 72 (1999) 157-243.
The evolution of a stop codon isn't quite so difficult to imagine if you keep in mind that the whole thing was kluged together.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by semilanceata, posted 04-28-2008 8:49 AM semilanceata has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024