Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,425 Year: 3,682/9,624 Month: 553/974 Week: 166/276 Day: 6/34 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Are the bulk of ID and Wedge arguments little more than the Chewbacca Defense?
Taz
Member (Idle past 3313 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 7 of 12 (466696)
05-16-2008 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Deftil
05-15-2008 12:10 PM


Deftil writes:
So far, the Chewbacca defense is about all i've seen from the ID camp.
Unfortunately, it works very well against the common person, though. Juries often find the defendant not guilty simply because they mistook the confusion for reasonable doubt.
The chewbacca defense could also take another form that is less likely to be spotted. The defense (or IDer) could introduce an "expert" in DNA or cars or gun or whatever. Then the "expert" spends the next hour explaining in detail using very complicated words and phrases (fortune cookie language) something that almost has something to do with the case being discussed. It's close enough to the case that you think it's relevant to the case. But after of listening to the mumble jumble fortune cookie language, you are completely confused.
But here is the kicker. Most people don't want to ever admit that they are confused about something because the next guy over doesn't want to admit it. Makes them look like idiots. So, they'd go away with a confused state of mind, and voila we have reasonable doubt.
All you have to do is go to the spherical issue thread and read IamJoseph's posts to see a real live version of the chewbacca defense for ID and creationism.
The less educated a person is, the less likely he'd admit to being confused or not understand something. Unfortunately, most people out there aren't very educated about science. This is why the chewbacca defense works so well among the science uneducated.

I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't put my head that far up my ass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Deftil, posted 05-15-2008 12:10 PM Deftil has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Trae, posted 05-18-2008 4:51 PM Taz has replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3313 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 9 of 12 (466967)
05-18-2008 9:14 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Trae
05-18-2008 4:51 PM


I honestly don't know. In an ideal situation, I'd say we could simply expose the ID side and their bullshit with genuine science. But... we're not in an ideal situation. Most people out there don't even know the difference between a virus and a bacterium. I remember when I took psychology in college. Most people that were in my class were english majors and whatnot. Our instructor had the hardest time trying to explain evolution to everyone. I had already taken evolutionary biology at the time so I knew what was going on, but she had trouble explaining the very simple concepts of mutation and natural selection to most of the people in class.
In fact, I continue to find it hard to explain evolution to normal everyday people. They already have this misconception in mind about evolution (probably due to sci fi movies and creationist agenda) that evolution means a dog morphs into a cat and then morphs into a snake, or if you want to get interesting a person somehow grows a pair of wings and become "evolved". When I explain evolution to people, I usually have to try to explain to them that evolution isn't like that at all.
ID, on the other hand, has the advantage of simplicity. "Goddunit" takes almost no time at all to say. God (specifically the judeo-christian god) snaps his fingers and voila we have life. It's an intellectual dead-end, but it's also easy enough to understand that the common man finds it much easier to swallow than scientific theories.
So, my short answer to your question is I see a dark and grim future up ahead.

I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't put my head that far up my ass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Trae, posted 05-18-2008 4:51 PM Trae has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Trae, posted 05-20-2008 1:14 AM Taz has replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3313 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 11 of 12 (467177)
05-20-2008 1:50 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by Trae
05-20-2008 1:14 AM


Trae writes:
Which is a better counter to the Chewbacca defense, “Science never knows anything for certain” or “The Theory of Evolution is as certain as pretty much anything else in science” in terms of explaining what is meant by scientific certainty?
I wouldn't say science never knows anything for certain. I'd say science refuses to claim to know anything with 100% certainty. This is what sets science apart from religion. Every religion that has ever existed has claimed to have the monopoly on "truth" with 100% certainty.
What I would try to do, then, is try to explain to the lay person that 100% certainty is impossible to achieve, period. Yes, most of the time this is an impossible task considering the fact that the better part of the population has been indoctrinated to believe that christianity is 100% certain of truth. This is why I also advocate the shut-the-hell-up policy. This is a simple policy. If you don't know diddly squat about science, shut the hell up.
I very often point this out to people. They don't see or hear about me telling my mechanic what to do. That's because, while I have a rudimentary knowledge of what's what in the car, I can't even begin to tell you how the hell I'd go about fixing the air conditioner... or replacing it. My ultimate aim is to spread the gospel of STHU to as many people as I can. You know, there's a reason why people don't see me in the geology forum.

I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't put my head that far up my ass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Trae, posted 05-20-2008 1:14 AM Trae has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Trae, posted 05-22-2008 3:41 AM Taz has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024