Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,797 Year: 4,054/9,624 Month: 925/974 Week: 252/286 Day: 13/46 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Absence of Evidence..............
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17827
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 128 of 138 (468987)
06-02-2008 6:49 PM
Reply to: Message 127 by Straggler
06-02-2008 6:40 PM


Re: Misapprehensions of Evidence
I recently posted on the issue.
To sum up, 1 Corinthians chapter 15 gives a list of "appearances" with no real detail.
If the author of Mark wrote about these appearances, it did not survive.
The accounts in Mathew, Luke and John contradict each other enough that none of them can be trusted.
It appears that by the time the Gospels were written the story was already confused.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by Straggler, posted 06-02-2008 6:40 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by randman, posted 06-02-2008 6:55 PM PaulK has replied
 Message 133 by Straggler, posted 06-02-2008 7:21 PM PaulK has not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17827
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 131 of 138 (468995)
06-02-2008 7:07 PM
Reply to: Message 130 by randman
06-02-2008 6:55 PM


Re: Misapprehensions of Evidence
And my point is that to say that there were empirical observations of the risen Jesus is to beg the question. We don't know what the basis for the accounts that we have really was. Maybe it was something that would qualify as empirical evidence - but maybe it wasn't.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by randman, posted 06-02-2008 6:55 PM randman has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024