Why Lie? (Re: Evolution frauds and hoaxes)

If evolution is such a sound science, why are there so many forgeries?

With so many frauds, the evolutionary family tree is thinning of the fossil evidence necessary to give credence to their theories.

So I can be right AND wrong, about the same thing, and that’s OK?

To you 10,000 years (give or take a few centuries) is OK only because you ASSUME that there are 4.6 Billion years to play with.

Science has not proven the age of the earth ...

... plus or minus 1% is stated as fact in textbooks and on websites. This to me is fudging the truth. If you don’t know say, you don’t know.

I have just had some of the most arrogant pompous asses all looking down their noses as me because I challenge what they so religiously assume. I am called "ignorant" because I have the gall to say "hey wait a minute, you are not making any logical sense." I am told to just shut up and “believe” or “trust” the experts and keep my “hillbilly” self under a rock. Evolutionists are not special ultra smart untouchable people that have a pure heart and never lie, never do things for money of fame (because they are scientist stupid) and always, always show the truth with no bias EVER. Please! The very essence of one’s world view dictates what one will pursue as truth.

Evos are claiming that Haeckel's drawings are "evidence for evolution" so in fact, they are indeed trying to use faked data as evidence. If you notice the quotes, you'd see that despite creationists and perhaps others detailing Haeckel's fraud from the 1800s until this very day, evos have continued to try to use the fraudulent data during that whole time.As criticism becomes more intense (the internet helped), evos tend to back off but as we see in the 2002 paper, it's typically only a few short years before they are back at it again, trying to promote the biogenetic law in some form or another.
Evos are claiming that Haeckel's drawings are "evidence for evolution" so in fact, they are indeed trying to use faked data as evidence. If you notice the quotes, you'd see that despite creationists and perhaps others detailing Haeckel's fraud from the 1800s until this very day, evos have continued to try to use the fraudulent data during that whole time.As criticism becomes more intense (the internet helped), evos tend to back off but as we see in the 2002 paper, it's typically only a few short years before they are back at it again, trying to promote the biogenetic law in some form or another.

Was it the scientists that were doing these reconstructions?