Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 85 (8984 total)
38 online now:
AnswersInGenitals, jar, Meddle, ringo (4 members, 34 visitors)
Newest Member: Jerry Johnson
Post Volume: Total: 877,358 Year: 9,106/23,288 Month: 121/1,544 Week: 396/518 Day: 64/57 Hour: 0/7

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Are theistic evolutionists really IDers?
obvious Child
Member (Idle past 2660 days)
Posts: 661
Joined: 08-17-2006

Message 91 of 91 (469245)
06-04-2008 6:44 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by randman
06-01-2008 5:07 PM

Re: Where I stand
There is no rigorous examination of ID by it's detractors. That is most clearly seen by their numerous misrepresentations of it. Heck, they don't even understand it, much less can claim to have rigorously considered ID papers and claims.

How convenient. Whenever ID is totally annihilated then you get to claim that the detractors have gotten it all wrong as you change what ID actually is.

ID was shredded as early as 1997.

ID's claim is simple and can be reduced to one sentence. If one cannot explain something now, God must therefore be the cause. The entire eye argument is that. As the eye is too complex to explain with the current information, Goddidit. The problem is that our knowledge keeps expanding. ID's logic dictates that prior to an understanding of seasons, that God was the source of the seasons. Interesting enough there were and still are religions that believe that.

ID has no experiments whatsoever.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by randman, posted 06-01-2008 5:07 PM randman has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020