I heard a illustration once of how a evolutionist looks at "evidence" "A Scientest is doing a experiment on a frog, to see how far it can jump. so tells the frog "Jump frog, jump," he jumps 5 feet. he cuts 1 leg off, "Jump frog, jump," He jumps 4 feet. he cuts off another leg, "Jump frog, jump," He jumps 3 feet. so he cuts off another leg, "Jump frog, jump," he jumps 2 feet. so he cuts off it's last leg, and says "Jump frog, jump," it doesn't jump. so he comes to his conclusion, frogs with no legs lose there hearing.
This is off topic here. Take it to the thread in the next post
it has been proven that the sun is shrinking at a rate of about 0.1% per century. for a creationist that's no problem, but for a evolutionist, just going back 100,000 years would make the sun twice the size it is now. 20 million years ago the earth would have just came to ground level of the sun. now tell me, how could prime-mates have just been evolving into "humans" Then?