Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,505 Year: 3,762/9,624 Month: 633/974 Week: 246/276 Day: 18/68 Hour: 4/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Age Correlations and an Old Earth: Version 1 No 3 (formerly Part III)
sl33w
Member (Idle past 5755 days)
Posts: 53
Joined: 05-23-2008


Message 271 of 357 (470118)
06-09-2008 3:09 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by RAZD
06-11-2006 7:15 PM


Re: Young earth, it's bogus
"Mathematics is the most exact science known to man."
The "Beginning of Time" (Genesis 5.1) was in 4148 BC.
The "Flood" was in 2492 BC.
This has been determined by "grade school math" and by "grade school reading comprehension."
For this reason, five of us have very close conclusions.
A) Barnabas, 2ns century, "creation was about 4,000 years before Christ."
B) Bishop Ussher, 1300s, "creation was exactly 4,000 years before Christ, being in 4,004 BC."
C) The "false Prophet," William Miller, AD 1843; about 4,000 BC.
D) Sidney Williams, 2006, 4148 BC was the "Beginning of Time" (Gen 5.1).
A & B & C had confused the "Beginning of Time," when Adam was chased out of the garden of Eden (Gen 5) with the Creation.
But here are four grmmarians and mathematicians pretty much in agreement.
In the deep, deep Dark Ages, the Beast and the False Prophet dated the Exodus from Egypt to have been about 1359 BC.
The gramarians concluded about 1635 BC.
Carbon-dating agreed with the deep, deep Dark Ages.
sl33w

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by RAZD, posted 06-11-2006 7:15 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024