Life changes and I don’t have a problem with that. But the Theory of Evolution has some bad baggage assoiated with it. One of these is the idea of random mutations. For me the idea of observer determined quantum outcomes at the genetic level provides a feedback loop and would explain the changes that do happen much better than the idea of random.
Perhaps it could be tested statistically on the premise that conscious guided changes would achieve quicker and more direct changes in living things. And would produce far fewer mutations than if changes were purely by chance.
Edited by no1nose, : No reason given.