Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Prophecy of the 70 weeks of Daniel
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 166 of 365 (472511)
06-22-2008 11:15 PM
Reply to: Message 163 by starman
06-22-2008 8:21 PM


Re: 70 weeks of Daniel
Starman writes:
I am starting to doubt that understanding the book is the goal with some here. It seems more of desperate and weak attempt to confuse, and cast doubt on it. But I might be missing something somewhere.
Good brother, imo, you are an angel/messenger from God to EvC. I surely hope you will remain on this site for a long time.
These folks do bring up a lot of stuff which many onlookers out there are thinking, so hopefully even if none here accept the truth, others out there in cyberspace will be enlightened. I pray so.
May God bless you for the time and effort you've put into this inportant and interesting topic.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 163 by starman, posted 06-22-2008 8:21 PM starman has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 168 of 365 (472515)
06-22-2008 11:33 PM
Reply to: Message 165 by ramoss
06-22-2008 11:05 PM


Messiah Definition
ramoss writes:
Pardon, but that exactly what 'messiah' means. It literally means "anointed one". The two terms are synonymous
You're mistaken there, Ramoss. No way does the text in Daniel fit the description of the prophesied Biblical messiah as depicted by any of the prophets, Old Testament or New. The messiah may be an anointed one, but the word/term anointed may apply to numerous situations relative to scripture whereas messiah would not.
Merriam Webster definition of messiah:
1 capitalized a : the expected king and deliverer of the Jews b : Jesus Christ regarded as the savior of the world by Christians
2 : a leader of some hope or cause : DELIVERER

This message is a reply to:
 Message 165 by ramoss, posted 06-22-2008 11:05 PM ramoss has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 172 by ramoss, posted 06-23-2008 9:52 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 173 by doctrbill, posted 06-23-2008 3:11 PM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 174 of 365 (472632)
06-23-2008 6:10 PM
Reply to: Message 173 by doctrbill
06-23-2008 3:11 PM


Re: "Christ David"
doctrbill writes:
'Messiah' is the Latinized form of messias, which is a Greek transliteration of the Hebrew mashiyach (the anointed one).
Well then I, Buzsaw, according to the Greek can lay claim to "the anointed one." I have been ageipsantesed (anointed) according to James 5:14 for healing by the elders of the church.
However, Buzsaw/anointed not Buzsaw/messiah. I don't fit the definition of the latter nor do I fit the criteria of the prophets including Daniel's little stone/messiah that demolishes the kingdoms and his becomes the prevalent global one. If you can't even accept the dictionary definition of these word/terms, then I can't help you.
You people need to get real. I provided a bonafide dictionary definition of each word and no way do they interchange as per definition. I'm not denying the anointing of Cyrus, but he sure does in no way fit the ticket for Biblical messiah. You people who claim so are just showing your ignorance of Biblical doctrine, including the deciphering of the prophecies.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 173 by doctrbill, posted 06-23-2008 3:11 PM doctrbill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 175 by PaulK, posted 06-23-2008 6:52 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 181 by doctrbill, posted 06-23-2008 11:01 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 176 of 365 (472653)
06-23-2008 9:08 PM
Reply to: Message 175 by PaulK
06-23-2008 6:52 PM


Re: "Christ David"
PaulK writes:
Disagreeing with Christian doctrine is not the same as being ignorant of it. As we have seen Christian "decipherings" are simply force-fitting the text into doctrine. Rejecting that is a sign of knowledge, not ignorance.
One can concoct up about any doctrine they want by isolating scripture texts. One must apply corroborating scriptures in understanding Biblical prophecy as well as other doctrines. Daniel was given what God wanted to dish out for his time but John the prophet of the NT who wrote Revelation filled in many of the blanks which were not revealed to Daniel. That's why in Daniel 12:8 and 9 when Daniel wanted to know the end of all these things, God told him to go his way for the words are closed up and sealed til the time of the end.
One must go to Revelation 13, 17 and 18 where the ten horned beast becomes the 10 horns of Daniel's beast. There are many similarities of Daniel's account and John's. For example, both beasts persecute the saints of God (i.e Christians), etc. This is happening as we debate. Daniel's 10 horn beast is now emerging and the long prophesied anti-christ is likely present on earth now. Obama get's close to the description, but I'm not yet saying he is the one. Perhaps so; perhaps not. Obama is a Muslim. I'm convinced of that.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by PaulK, posted 06-23-2008 6:52 PM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 182 by PaulK, posted 06-24-2008 1:37 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 177 of 365 (472658)
06-23-2008 9:29 PM


10 Horned Beast/Integrating the Races
Another clue to the 10 horned beast of Daniel relative to the end times is the phenomena of integrating the races. Read it in Daniel 2:40-43. God separated the races and attempting to mix them is like attempting to mix water with diesel fuel. Your diesel will either not run at all or spit and sputter at half speed or less. That's where the world is going.
The Daniel 2 Image's 10 toes are what the 10 horns are to the beast, the end time antichrist world government.

Replies to this message:
 Message 178 by DrJones*, posted 06-23-2008 9:39 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 183 by PaulK, posted 06-24-2008 1:49 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 179 of 365 (472667)
06-23-2008 10:00 PM
Reply to: Message 178 by DrJones*
06-23-2008 9:39 PM


Re: 10 Horned Beast/Integrating the Races
DrJones writes:
mmm good old religious inspired racial bigotry
No, Doc, no bigotry. I get along fine with blacks, Jews, Hispanics and all and treat them alike; always have. Im just observing the prophecy and observing the Jeremiah Wrights, the Black Muslim Nation of Islam and such.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 178 by DrJones*, posted 06-23-2008 9:39 PM DrJones* has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 180 by DrJones*, posted 06-23-2008 10:46 PM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 223 of 365 (472899)
06-25-2008 6:00 PM
Reply to: Message 180 by DrJones*
06-23-2008 10:46 PM


Re: 10 Horned Beast/Integrating the Races
DrJones writes:
But you wouldn't a black man marrying your daughter or a persian woman marrying your son would you?
1. I go with the science on that one. Though I'd rather have a good Christian black daughter-in-law than an atheist or even a secularist one, the science seems to be that the majority tendency is to prefer one's own color and race. All one need do is go in the churches and neighborhoods, of the world to come to that conclusion. History attests to it.
2. I would advise a single son to marry into his own race since God created the races but if my son came home with a black bride I and wifie would go out of our way to make the new bride feel welcome and treat her as we would a white one.
3. Imo, vanilla/chocolate swirl is cool with ice cream, but not as cool with races.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 180 by DrJones*, posted 06-23-2008 10:46 PM DrJones* has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 225 of 365 (472903)
06-25-2008 6:19 PM
Reply to: Message 216 by Brian
06-25-2008 4:06 PM


Re: Earliest extant
I suppose 167-164 BC would be it, unless there are earlier ones from other sources. Or would it be 200 years after the Book of Daniel was written?
THE DANIEL B DEAD SEA SCROLL
BIBLE: DANIEL 3:26 - 27
MS in Aramaic on vellum, Qumran, ca. 4 BC-68 AD, 4 fragments sticking together, each 1,8x1,9 cm, of which 3 are inscribed, part of 3+1+2 lines in a Herodian Hebrew book script. The uninscribed fragment, 0,7x2,4 cm, and further a linen cloth 2,2x4,2 cm adhering.
Context: Part of the Dead Sea Scroll 1QDanb=1Q72, of which 2 larger fragments (11,3x9,6 cm 14 lines and 5,8x6,4 cm 7 lines), and ca. 9 tiny fragments (mostly uninscribed) survives, with the text of Daniel 3:22 - 31. Fragment 2 from the present MS matches the largest fragment. They were found in Cave 1 in a lump of vellum consisting of 9 layers also containing 1QDana and 1QPrayers.
Published without the present fragments in: Discoveries in the Judaean Desert I, Oxford 1955, pp. 150-155; and in: J.C. Trever: Completion of the Publication of some Fragments from Qumran Cave I, in: Revue de Qumran, tome 5, no. 19, Nov. 1965.
Provenance: 1. Community of the Essenes, Qumran (ca. 4 BC-68 AD); 2. Qumran Cave 1 (68-1948); 3. George Isha'ya, finder (1948); 4. Syrian orthodox Monastery of St. Mark (Metropolitan Athanasius Samuel), Jerusalem (1948); 5. Gift to John C. Trever, Jerusalem, Claremont and Laguna Hills, California (1948-1994).
Commentary: Daniel 3:26 - 27 is not present on any other Dead Sea Scroll, so this MS is the earliest witness to the text, actually written in the lifetime of Christ and the Apostles.
Originally written 167-164 BC, Hebrew is the original language of Daniel 1:1 - 2:4, Aramaic of 2:4 - 12:13. The present MS is in the original language as well, and copied only about 200 years after the book of Daniel was written.
Published: Dr. Bruce Zuckerman and Dr. Marilyn Lundberg in: The Comprehensive Aramaic Lexicon, Newsletter, no. 12, Cincinnati, Ohio, autumn 1996.
Exhibited: 1. XVI Congress of the International Organization for the study of the Old Testament. Faculty of Law Library, University of Oslo, 29 July - 7 August 1998; 2. NorFa - Nordic network in Qumran studies. Symposium in Oslo 3-5. June 2004.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 216 by Brian, posted 06-25-2008 4:06 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 230 by PaulK, posted 06-25-2008 6:33 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 242 by Brian, posted 06-26-2008 9:37 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 236 of 365 (472935)
06-25-2008 9:58 PM


Skeptic Bias
There's all of this skepticism relative to the extant Biblical manuscripts. To my knowledge, nobody is questioning the accuracy of Homer's Iliad and Odyssey.
Homer lived somewhere around a millennium BC, yet the oldest extant manuscripts of that are around two millenniums after they were written, about 1000 AD.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

Replies to this message:
 Message 237 by ramoss, posted 06-25-2008 10:44 PM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 238 of 365 (472939)
06-25-2008 11:24 PM
Reply to: Message 237 by ramoss
06-25-2008 10:44 PM


Re: Skeptic Bias
ramos writes:
As far as I see, no one is trying to say the works of Homer are prophecy, and it means your soul if you disbelieve in it.
Loose your soul for disbelieving Daniel? I don't see that as a criteria for salvation, though most saved people likely believe the account. Many do not study it or try to understand it but anyone who prayerfully and carefully delves into it becomes apprised on much of the whys and wherefores of where the world is headed. In the last chapter some added significant data is given relative to our times, though that is straying from the topic of this thread.
The Bible begins with the origin of human history and ends with it's finality when new heavens, earth and Jerusalem/Holy City replace it.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 237 by ramoss, posted 06-25-2008 10:44 PM ramoss has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 239 of 365 (472940)
06-26-2008 12:13 AM
Reply to: Message 196 by starman
06-24-2008 2:49 PM


Re: 70 weeks of Daniel
PaulK writes:
The "truth", then, is what?? That the savior is some Persian king? Get serious. He could never begin to fulfill all that was said about the Saviour. Obviously. That all you got??
The truth, Paul is that the fierce king who utters the dark sentences in verses 23-26 is a deceitful impressive slippery fellow who destroys many, all the while talking peacefully. He makes war with the "holy ones," i.e. the true Christians in the end times. Note that in Daniel 7:25 the notable little horn of the beast "made war with the saints and prevailed against them." The notable little horn who persecutes the saints (holy ones) is one and the same mighty one who persecutes the "holy ones" in chapter 8. His kingdom is also the same beast kingdom of Revelation 13 in the NT which "makes war with the saints and overcomes them." The planet is witnessing this as we debate. War is being waged on the Christians in Africa, Muslim nations, Communist nations, etc. The globalist beast kingdom, i.e. world government is emerging via the UN which btw is anti-Christian and pro-Muslim. You and others here need to corroborate these scriptures or you'll never understand them or whataheck is going on in the world today.
Note how many times the "end times" and similar wording appears in these visions.
Note also that when he confronts the "Prince of princes" in verse 25 of 8 that he is "broken without hand." John the revelator says messiah Jesus will destroy his enemies with the breath of his mouth or something similar to that when he appears to Jerusalem to set up shop/kingdom. This corroborates with the "little stone" of the first image vision which destroys the world kingdoms and becomes the mountain replacing the destroyed kingdoms of this world.
Starman is right. Your arguments are full of holes so as to attemp to secularize everything that Daniel prophesied and to render as contemporary history. You pick and choose so as to overlook anything and everything that doesn't fit your secularist mindset for the book of Daniel, Jehovah's prophet.
Edited by Buzsaw, : Add embolding

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 196 by starman, posted 06-24-2008 2:49 PM starman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 240 by PaulK, posted 06-26-2008 1:53 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 241 by Brian, posted 06-26-2008 8:59 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 243 of 365 (472982)
06-26-2008 9:37 AM
Reply to: Message 240 by PaulK
06-26-2008 1:53 AM


Re: 70 weeks of Daniel
PaulK writes:
Except that the stone is never identified as a single person. The stone simply seems to be the Kingdom of God. There simply is no corroboration there.
As usual, in your ignorance of how Biblical eschatology works, you choose to secularize the holy writ by isolating texts and skewing them into secular literature. Both corroborated visions are of the world class empires and both end with the end time messianic prince of princes/conquering stone and you refuse to acknowledge the obvious.
PaulK writes:
You mean he is right to grossly misrepresent my arguments, because it is the only way you can deal with them ? He is right to misrepresent and reject the Bible, because the Bible is subject to the dogma that you share ? He is right to confuse matters by failing even to keep track of his own arguments, because you have no real case ?
If you praise starman's dismal record you only confirm how hopelessly weak your position is.
Starman is obviously a highly intelligent, articulate, efficient and witty contribution to EvC. Pay attention to his wisdom and your Biblical understanding will be enhanced.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 240 by PaulK, posted 06-26-2008 1:53 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 244 by ramoss, posted 06-26-2008 10:30 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 246 by PaulK, posted 06-26-2008 2:54 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 248 by starman, posted 06-27-2008 1:05 AM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 245 of 365 (472997)
06-26-2008 11:54 AM
Reply to: Message 244 by ramoss
06-26-2008 10:30 AM


Re: 70 weeks of Daniel
That can work both ways, Ramos. The POMs here often attest to that.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 244 by ramoss, posted 06-26-2008 10:30 AM ramoss has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 258 of 365 (473248)
06-27-2008 10:37 PM
Reply to: Message 248 by starman
06-27-2008 1:05 AM


Re: 70 weeks of Daniel
Starman writes:
That seems to be the simple reality here. I would suggest you rethink any perceived calling, or need to be bogged down here. It is a big world, and there are lots of forums. Why be unequally yoked with unbelievers??
Starman, I've been here over 4 years. These folks need people like you, me, Nemesis and other like minded ones whether they realize it or not. There are times when you simply need to ignore Biblifobic nonsense and move on with something positive. The minority POV finds it necessary to pick and choose where to respond to hyperactive opponents who choose to ignore the obvious in scripture.
The whole problem I see with secularists relative to anything supernatural is that if they ever (I say ever) admit to one miracle, their secularism is cooked and they become accountable to a higher power.
The book of Daniel, as is most of the Bible is full of the supernatural. That's why they have to mine out and isolate verses and segments which they can use to obfuscate the interpretation into their secularist mindset.
I pray that God will, by his mighty Holy Spirit, enlighten their understanding and effect their conversion. I'm optimistic about that, given they are mere men/women and God is almighty.
Creationist scientists like Henry Morris of ICR were once secularists
who's mindset were enlightened by truth.
Don't be discouraged, my brother. Just remember, when you score points as you have here, they don't take it well and sometimes take it out on the messenger and the threads get red hot in a hurry.
Jesus wasn't yoked to the Temple where he ministered to hostile counterparts, nor was Paul and the apostles when they mingled with the
Pharisees in ministry, even eating and drinking with them at times.
They were'nt preaching to the choir by any means.
Keep your cool, be especially mindful of the Forum Guidelines and you'll do fine.
Edited by Buzsaw, : Fix grammatical errors

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 248 by starman, posted 06-27-2008 1:05 AM starman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 260 by starman, posted 06-27-2008 11:22 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 266 of 365 (473377)
06-28-2008 4:39 PM
Reply to: Message 261 by PaulK
06-28-2008 3:31 AM


Re: Summing up the 70 weeks
PaulK writes:
The greater context also supports the conventional view. The prophecy of Daniel 8 tells us that the End Times will occur while the Hellenistic kingdoms following Alexander still survive.
1. Beginning in verse 15 of Chapter 8 the angel from God begins to explain the interpretation of the vision.
2. Verse 17: ".....the vision belongeth to the time of the end."
3. Verse 19: "I will make you to know what shall be in the latter time of the indignation, for it belongeth to the appointed time of the end.
4. It is important to note that the Ram empire in chapter 8 consists of two co-ruling nations, Media and Persia, consistent with history, one being the prominent kingdom of the empire.
5. Verse 21: ".....the rough he-goat is the nation of Greece.". (This would be the third empire of Daniel's chapter 2 image vision.)
6. The Greek Empire after Alexander's death becomes divided (the 4 horns (Daniel 8:8) "toward the four winds of heaven," i.e. the historical four smaller empires consisting of the segmentation of Alexanders world empire became re-immerged into the Roman Empire by the time of Christ.
By 300 BC, all that was left of Alexander's empire were four smaller empires, each controlled by military generals who declared themselves kings. Greece and Macedonia fell to Antigonus, who founded the Antigonid dynasty of Greek kings; this dynasty would eventually control Asia Minor. Asia Minor original came under the control of Attalid dynasty, but was eventually subsumed under the Antigonids. Mesopotamia and the Middle East came under the control of Seleucus, who crowned himself Seleucus I and began the Seleucus dynasty (every king in this dynasty would be named Seleucus). Egypt came under the control of Ptolemy, who crowned himself Ptolemy I and began the Ptolemid dynasty. The Ptolemids maintained Greek learning and culture, but adopted several Egyptian customs surrounding the kingship, such as inheritance through the maternal line (see the chapter on women in Egyptian history and culture).
These empires periodically fought with one another, for none of these kings ever fully accepted the fact that the empire had fractured into three parts. Each believed that they were the rightful heirs to the entire empire that Alexander had built. Countries, such as Judah, periodically shifted from one empire to another as the fortunes of war went now to the Ptolemies and now to the Seleucids.
Despite the constant conflict, the Hellenistic world was an incredibly prosperous one. Alexander and his successors had liberated an immense amount of wealth from the Persian empire, and with this new wealth in circulation the standard of living rose dramatically. Each of the empires embarked on building projects, on scholarship, on patronage of the arts, and on literature and philosophy. The Ptolemies built an enormous library in their capital city of Alexandria, and sponsored the translation of a host of religious and literary works into Greek.
This period really marked the first international culture in western, middle eastern, and north African history. The Greeks imported their culture: political theory, philosophy, art, and literature all over the known civilized world. This culture would greatly alter the culture and religion of the Mediterannean. But the flow of culture worked in the opposite direction as well; non-Greek ideas and non-Greeks flowed into Greece (and Italy). They took with them their religions, their philosophies, science, and culture; in this environment, eastern religions in particular began to take hold in the Greek city-states both in the east and in Greece. Among these religions was Zoroastrianism and Mithraism; in later years, this international environment would provide the means for the spread of another eastern religion, Christianity.
This process of the "hellenization" ("making Greek") of the world took place largely in the urban centers the Greeks began to zealously build. While the Greeks had for a long time believed that monarchy was a sign of barbarity, they had to come to terms with the reality of their new form of government. So they compromised. While they accepted the monarchy, the set about building somewhat independent poleis that had the structure of the polis without its political independence. The growth of these cities provoked massive migrations from the Greek mainland, as Greeks settled in these new, far-flung poleis to assume lucrative positions in the military and administration.
Spread from Italy to India, from Macedonia to Egypt, Greek culture was the most significant of its times. The mighty empires of the Greeks hung onto this vast amount of territory for almost three centuries. Slowly, however, a new power was rising in the west, steadily building its own, accidental empire. By the time of Christ, the great Greek empires of the Hellenistic world had been replaced and unified once more into a single empire under the control of an Italian people, the Romans.
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~dee/GREECE/3EMPIRES.HTM
(Embolding mine for emphasis)
7. In order to get a handle on Biblical eschatology relative to the NT church age one must understand that the OT is primarily a genealogical and historical account of the world relative to God's kingdom nation, Israel. The NT church age was a mystery not revealed in depth to Israel, to whom the OT law, the temple and Levitical priesthood pertained. Thus the church age is referred to in the NT as a mystery. (Example; Revelation 10:7 where at the sound of the 7th and last trumpet the mystery of God is finished, i.e. the church age. This is when the millennial messianic kingdom is about to emerge on planet earth.
8. The Roman Empire consisted of the re-immerged Greek empire which would later disintegrate into what is referred to as the East and the West as we refer to it today, i.e. the two legs of Daniel's chap 2 image prophecy which would expand as time passed.
9. As future events became further removed from Daniel's time, the prophet's revelation diminished as to specificity. Thus we must hone in on certain specifics which were revealed to him.
10. In verse 23 in the "latter time" of the these kingdoms, having re-emerged by the Romans and eventually becoming global, "when the transgressors are come to the full, a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences shall stand up." Verse 24: And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power; and he shall destroy wonderfully."
11. v 24: ".....he shall destroy the mighty ones and the holy people." Note that at the time Jesus, the Christ was born, the "holy people" were not Israel. The Jews delivered Jesus up to the civil government to execute the messiah Jesus, so the "holy people" were/are the true Biblical Christians who have been persecuted throughout the Christian era, some by professing Christians who were militant, by pagan religions, by Islamic and secularistic enemies of Christianity.
12. verse 24: his might shall not be by his own power. His power comes from Satan and his invisible kingdom of angels which are cast to the earth in Revelation 12 to energize the 10 horned (i.e. Daniel's toes) emerging world empire of Revelation 13 and 17, that empire which destroys Mystery Babylon (likely Vatican City) of Revelation 17 and 18.
13. Verse 25: He destroys many who considered themselves to be secure. 9:11 comes to mind and the phenomenal global imergence of the expansion of militant Islam.
14. Finally and most importantly, this anti-christ one of the end times comes head to head with the "prince of princes," i.e messiah (Jesus) who is to appear and "shall be broken without hand," i.e not by humans but by God who has the beast, the false prophet and the host who followed them having their mark, to be cast into the lake of fire.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 261 by PaulK, posted 06-28-2008 3:31 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 267 by Brian, posted 06-28-2008 4:57 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 268 by PaulK, posted 06-28-2008 5:10 PM Buzsaw has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024