AlphaOmegakid writes:
Why is the law of biogenesis which states that "all life comes from preexisting living matter" not taught in any modern textbook today?
First of all, it's not actually a law, although it's sometimes refered to as a law. But more importantly, IT IS BEING TAUGHT IN SCHOOL, unless of course you don't pay attention in class.
It is probably one of the most widely used laws in biology and biological studies, but the law and the history of the law is ignored.
Yeah, and oxygen gas is probably the most widely used compound in the history of man, and yet you won't find it mentioned once in any history book. Why? Because it's a duh kinda thing, unless you're a special kind of idiot.
I'm a firm believer in teaching science in schools, and not teaching non-science matters which are religious. How can we justify teaching abiogenetic science which is full of faith and little evidence and not teach biogenesis which is full of science and no faith?
I don't know what you are smoking, but when I was in high school a kazillion years ago when certain hypotheses of abiogenesis were introduced our teacher kept repeating that they were all educated guesses, nothing more.
Abiogenesis is not "full of faith". We know for a fact that organic compounds form naturally under certain conditions. Scientists have been able to observe pre-cells form naturally under certain conditions. While abiogenesis is still in its infancy, it is definitely not based on faith.
Go ahead and try this some time. Go to any college or university and talk to any biology professor about abiogensis. You're going to get a lot of I-don't-knows and it's-hard-to-says because that's the truth. Unlike religionists who are know-it-alls, people in academia are at least more honest about what they do and don't know.
I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't put my head that far up my ass.