All Time Classic Creationist Pwnage (Re: Conservapedia and A. Schlafly vs. R. Lenski)

Conservapedia is always worth a laugh. Go browse the sections on homosexuality and atheism!The funny thing is that Schlaf is obviously thinking that the data looks like an 8th grader's science project with a few easy numbers and chart that he can demolish, rather than likely something that you would have to be a graduate student in biology to even begin to understand!Edited by Alasdair, : No reason given.

What are you referring to by the actions of the Smithsonian?

What if they had published an alchemy or astrology paper?

http://www.expelledexposed.com/index.php/the-truth/sternbergIs this who you are referring to?

Oh shit, the liberal media is against us, run!Which of these do you think is false?1) Stern was given notice of resignation 6 months before publication of the Meyer paper2) He remained an employee of NIH3) Stern didn't get his paper peer reviewed (as is required for publication in a peer reviewed journal, obviously), only reviewing it himselfSo he got some mean emails? Oh the conspiracy!

Back to making fun of Conservapedia!http://www.conservapedia.com/SpecialopularpagesMost popular pages!# Atheism ”(3,862,058 views)
# Homosexuality ”(3,130,901 views)
# Main Page ”(3,023,599 views)
# Wikipedia ”(477,588 views)
# Homosexual Agenda ”(336,583 views)
# Arguments Against Homosexuality ”(334,368 views)
# Ex-homosexuals ”(319,724 views)
# Examples of Bias in Wikipedia ”(314,028 views)
# Theory of evolution ”(312,783 views)
# Hillary Rodham Clinton ”(266,253 views)it's sort of ironic how obsessed they are with gay sex Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Disable smilies, which were mucking up URL.