Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,765 Year: 4,022/9,624 Month: 893/974 Week: 220/286 Day: 27/109 Hour: 3/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Discovery or Ignorance: The Choice Is yours?
subbie
Member (Idle past 1280 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 244 of 402 (474328)
07-07-2008 4:37 PM
Reply to: Message 243 by John 10:10
07-07-2008 4:33 PM


Re: John You Have Convinced Me
quote:
So the evolutionary model has been proven in a laboratory from start-to-finish to a high degree of accuracy, where single cell creatures have been developed into fully developed creature/species, able to reproduce themselves and mutate to other species?
Nope. That hasn't happened, and never will.
Fortunately, that standard doesn't need to be met in order for the ToE to be a valid and very valuable scientific theory.

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 243 by John 10:10, posted 07-07-2008 4:33 PM John 10:10 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 248 by John 10:10, posted 07-07-2008 4:45 PM subbie has replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1280 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 246 of 402 (474330)
07-07-2008 4:42 PM
Reply to: Message 242 by ICANT
07-07-2008 4:29 PM


Re: John You Have Convinced Me
quote:
Now I believe it is a scientifically proven absolute fact that if you put your head in one of those machines and it is activated and it decapitates your head that you will not survive.
Today, you are correct.
100 years from now, the state of the art in medicine may have advanced to the point where a severed head can be reattached.
If you understand this point, and understand why this means that all of science is tentative, you are well ahead of John.

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by ICANT, posted 07-07-2008 4:29 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 253 by ICANT, posted 07-07-2008 5:04 PM subbie has replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1280 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 250 of 402 (474335)
07-07-2008 4:56 PM
Reply to: Message 248 by John 10:10
07-07-2008 4:45 PM


Re: John You Have Convinced Me
quote:
We finally agree that ToE is a theory, not a fact.
I've never said it was anything other than a theory. Nor has anyone else at this site. You might have realized that long ago if you took a moment and recalled that it's called the Theory of Evolution.
quote:
We will just have to disagree as to how "very valuable" it is.
Well, you could ask any scientist who works in the field of biology. Then we won't have to disagree anymore. That is unless you think that your ideas about biology are more valuable than those of scientists who work in the field.

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 248 by John 10:10, posted 07-07-2008 4:45 PM John 10:10 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 254 by Rrhain, posted 07-07-2008 5:06 PM subbie has not replied
 Message 255 by John 10:10, posted 07-07-2008 5:06 PM subbie has replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1280 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 256 of 402 (474342)
07-07-2008 5:11 PM
Reply to: Message 253 by ICANT
07-07-2008 5:04 PM


Re: Ahead
quote:
All foolishness aside though I believe there are two scientific theories that will never be falsified. They are the BBT and ToE.
They can not be falsified. They only get propped up with another theory.
Naughty, naughty! First you said all foolishness aside, then you said something foolish. Tsk tsk tsk.
You seem to think that modifying a theory in light of newly discovered evidence is somehow "propping up" that theory. In fact, just about every theory that any scientist has ever proposed in the history of the world has been modified to some degree. It's one of the hallmarks of science, a part of that whole tentativity deal.

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 253 by ICANT, posted 07-07-2008 5:04 PM ICANT has not replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1280 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 257 of 402 (474345)
07-07-2008 5:23 PM
Reply to: Message 255 by John 10:10
07-07-2008 5:06 PM


A fond farewell to John
quote:
"Very valuable scientists" who work in the field of biology deal with theories that result in proven facts, not in theories that can never be proven.
Well, since your learning curve seems to be a flatline, I'm about done with you.
Let me leave you with this idea. You can wallow in ignorance or you can try to learn. If you really want to learn, ask a biologist if the ToE is an important theory. You can even ask a christian biologist. There are plenty of them out there. In fact, I'd be willing to bet any amount you'd be willing to risk that the vast majority of christian biologists working in the field of biology will tell you that the ToE is invaluable to the study of biology.
I'm quite certain that that fact will not impress you in the slightest. You've made your mind up, and you're not going to let the facts get in the way.
You think the ToE hasn't been "proven." I'll set aside for the moment your complete intellectual incapacity to understand the truism that science never proves any theory. Even if it can't be "proven," it's still the single most valuable tool that any biologist has to use in the study of biology. That is a fact. If you disagree, provide evidence. As you said yourself, everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but not their own facts.
Beyond that, I'm frankly weary of banging my head against the brick wall that is your head.

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 255 by John 10:10, posted 07-07-2008 5:06 PM John 10:10 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 288 by John 10:10, posted 07-08-2008 2:39 PM subbie has not replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1280 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 386 of 402 (474638)
07-09-2008 9:54 PM
Reply to: Message 384 by John 10:10
07-09-2008 9:35 PM


Re: This is the Science Forum; do science
quote:
I would be somewhat satisfied if evolutionists would simply say this, and then leave it at that. But if you will read many other posts on this topic, many others believe and state that the ToE is proven fact, not theory.
No.
What they say is that evolution is a fact. It has been observed, both in nature and in the lab. In real time. It has happened. Evolution is, at it's most basic, descent with modification. This means that daughter populations will differ from parent populations, and environmental pressures will affect which of those changes will be more likely to be passed on.
The Theory of Evolution is the scientific theory that explains how it happens, and explains how evolution has produced the variety of life on this planet. Everyone here agrees that this is a theory. That's why it's called the Theory of Evolution.

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 384 by John 10:10, posted 07-09-2008 9:35 PM John 10:10 has not replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1280 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 388 of 402 (474644)
07-09-2008 10:13 PM
Reply to: Message 387 by John 10:10
07-09-2008 10:01 PM


quote:
Extrapolating the predictions of the ToE backwards in time and calling this science does not meet the true definition of science.
You are completely missing the point of the language you quoted.
Rahvin writes:
Extrapolating the predictions of the Theory of Evolution backwards in time predicts a fossil record exactly like the one we observe in reality.
What Rahvin was saying was that the ToE makes certain types of predictions. If we extrapolate those predictions backwards in time, the ToE describes the kinds of things we should see in the fossil record. When we examine the fossil record, we see the things that the ToE tells us we will see. When the predictions that the ToE makes coincide with real world observations, this is a very powerful confirmation of the accuracy of the ToE.

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 387 by John 10:10, posted 07-09-2008 10:01 PM John 10:10 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 391 by ICANT, posted 07-09-2008 10:44 PM subbie has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024