Help Needed with an argument against ToE

As Onifre points out in Message 5, his argument argues as much against his own position as any other, containing an inherent contradiction. If his argument is correct, then his argument is as full of baloney as he claims evolution is. But if that's true, then his argument isn't full of baloney, and so we arrive at the old reductio ad absurdum fallacy. I can't see why anything more need be said.--Percy