Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Scotus rules 2nd amendment is an individual right
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4228 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 75 of 176 (475719)
07-17-2008 5:55 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by steeley42
07-17-2008 2:07 PM


give me a link or STFU

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by steeley42, posted 07-17-2008 2:07 PM steeley42 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by steeley42, posted 07-17-2008 7:19 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied

Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4228 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 76 of 176 (475721)
07-17-2008 6:00 PM


here's what i have to say about regulated automatics.
get a rubber band!

Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4228 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 105 of 176 (475959)
07-20-2008 6:59 AM
Reply to: Message 102 by Rrhain
07-19-2008 6:13 PM


And the fact that you ignored 95% of the post to focus on two sentences would seem to indicate that I was correct in describing your argument as disingenuous. If you don't wish to defend your argument, that's fine. But don't pretend that it's because I'm insulting you.
he probably learned that from you, you are the professional at this.
To my fellow liberty loving americans:
1. why even argue with these brits about this issue? this is our business, our country, our issue. anything they are saying about it is trollbait as far as i am concerned.
2. the second amendment is a response by our ancestors to thier ancestors, after reading thier dribble on the past two pages it is so obvious that the founding fathers knew so much about the british back then that so adequately applies to british today.
3. we are free independent citizens, they are still subjects to a crown. I cannot even begin to fathom the idea of a monarchy, that's how free i am.
Edited by Artemis Entreri, : nope

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by Rrhain, posted 07-19-2008 6:13 PM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by cavediver, posted 07-20-2008 8:23 AM Artemis Entreri has replied
 Message 109 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-20-2008 1:14 PM Artemis Entreri has replied
 Message 118 by Rrhain, posted 07-21-2008 12:37 AM Artemis Entreri has not replied

Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4228 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 107 of 176 (476003)
07-20-2008 12:42 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by cavediver
07-20-2008 8:23 AM


welcome back Artemis - you're far funnier when not suspended
yeah i never figured out why i got supended. no email, no communication from the admin, just complete censorship. I must have said something really on target to get that kind of response fron the EVC "Man".
It's about this thing called history, and I completely understand that that's a concept with which you have little experience...
by far the funniest comment of the week IMHO,
whatever you say, subject.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by cavediver, posted 07-20-2008 8:23 AM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by Granny Magda, posted 07-20-2008 12:53 PM Artemis Entreri has replied
 Message 113 by cavediver, posted 07-20-2008 2:16 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied
 Message 114 by cavediver, posted 07-20-2008 2:22 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied

Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4228 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 110 of 176 (476009)
07-20-2008 1:15 PM
Reply to: Message 108 by Granny Magda
07-20-2008 12:53 PM


Re: Just for the Record
so it was the youtube videos. and one of the admins is a grammar nazi. i will refrain from using youtube videos, even though the message stated using them as support which is what i did on the linked example.
poor quaility messages are purely subjective, and there is not much i can do about that.
i guess if i get cut off in the future it will be, because of lack of capitalization, and the lack of objectivity of the moderators, which to me is hilarious.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by Granny Magda, posted 07-20-2008 12:53 PM Granny Magda has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by bluegenes, posted 07-20-2008 2:52 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied

Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4228 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 111 of 176 (476010)
07-20-2008 1:19 PM
Reply to: Message 109 by Dr Adequate
07-20-2008 1:14 PM


Does the same apply to Americans talking about Britain? Or are you guys allowed to do that?
Do we ever talk about British laws? I doubt it.
Oh, I see you are.
Hypocrite much?
Whatever you say, subject.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-20-2008 1:14 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by Straggler, posted 07-20-2008 2:29 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied
 Message 116 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-20-2008 2:36 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied

Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4228 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 144 of 176 (476514)
07-24-2008 12:29 PM


just made you sad wanker of the month. Bit of growing up to be done, me thinks.
How about following the board rules? specifically #10.
I'll happily criticise Britsh law where I think it is stupid.
It none of my business, and I don’t care.
To get back to the subject at hand - I think the right for everyone to arm themselves is frankly mad.
Not quite as mad as trying to argue with some one about guns who has self admittedly never seen one up close, nor has fired one.
Yes. For example, in post #105, you disparage Britain for being a monarchy, which is a part of our constitution just as the Second Amendment is a part of yours.
Could you be more hypocritical?
I’m not the thread jacker who brought up your laws. Unless I’m horribly mistaken this thread is about the SCOTUS ruling on the 2nd amendment. Start a thread on ridiculous laws in the UK, I got tons of ammo on that one, but this is neither the time nor the place.
Wrong. The capital letter at the beginning of sentences, like the period and the space at the end, is there to make it easier to distinguish between sentences, so that reading is easier.
I’m using MS word now, so it auto capitalizes, I should have better posts now for the grammar Nazis.
You clearly haven't been paying attention. My style of posting is to respond pretty much to every single word the original poster wrote. It pisses some people off since it generates very long posts and it can come across as being pedantic.
Your style is trollish. Game recognize game, fo sho.
Personally, I would like more guns about. I'd like to carry one myself and assume the man next to me also has one. I bet that all these assholes I bump into on the streets of St Louis would be far more cordial if they thought I was packing. That they "know" that I'm not yields all sorts of assholishness that I bump into everyday (well, maybe not everyday, but all the days that I do go downtown. I mean, no body ever says "excuse me" anymore. No simple "hellos", nothing but a bunch of assholes bumping into each other without remark. It sucks ass. Nobody is friendly and it really "grinds my gears" [thanks Peter Griffen]. I honestly believe that if all of the law abiding citizens were "packing", then those assholes would be less assholish. Its that fact that we really cannot do anything about it, that permits the behavior. Now, having a gun on your hip doesn't mean you could actually "do anything" about it. Their use is strictly regulated. But it certainly, to me, makes people more friendly to each other. No talking shit or failing to excuse thyself would not be "acceptable" and people would be more cordial.)
Word.
Gotta say, CS, that has to be one of the scariest paragraphs I have ever read on EvC
Welcome to the US, or not.
Come to St. Louis and walk around with me for a while. That'll give you a benchmark with which to judge scary-ness. You might even want to have a gun afterwards.
DC is worse, mainly because if you are law abiding you are not allowed to defened yourself. In tha STL you can carry.
Its, like, the "most dangerous city" in the U.S. Well, StL or Detroit....
According to these guys (Yahoo) Detroit is #1 in 2008 and St. Louis is #2.
In 2007 it was (Safest and Most Dangerous U.S. Cities, 2007 )
Detroit#1 and St. Louis#2
In 2006 it was (http://money.cnn.com/...s/2006/real_estate/best_worst/2.html)
St. Louis#1 Detroit#2 (we beat them in crime and baseball that year!)
That's what the National Guard is for. By statute, they are the "militia."
"What of the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."---George Mason
"The right of self-defence is the first law of nature. When the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any colour or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction."---John Locke

Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-24-2008 12:55 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied
 Message 150 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-26-2008 11:13 PM Artemis Entreri has replied
 Message 151 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-27-2008 12:03 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied

Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4228 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 159 of 176 (476935)
07-28-2008 6:04 PM
Reply to: Message 150 by Dr Adequate
07-26-2008 11:13 PM


You're getting good at this hypocrisy thing, aren't you?
almost as good as you are at taking me out of context.
though i have much to learn about your inability to stay on the topic at hand.
Have you ever seen a monarch up close or lived under a constitutional monarchy?
yes. no.
Have you ever seen heroin up close or injected it?
yes. no.
Have you ever seen a murder up close or committed one?
yes. no.
Does driving too fast make a man especially qualified to set the speed limit?
yes.
can you stay on topic or is that not possible for you?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-26-2008 11:13 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4228 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 160 of 176 (476937)
07-28-2008 6:11 PM
Reply to: Message 156 by skepticfaith
07-28-2008 5:16 PM


Re: Charlton Heston
everyone know's that answer, but they all want to be politically correct, or they have another agenda besides reducing crime.
thanks for acknowledging this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by skepticfaith, posted 07-28-2008 5:16 PM skepticfaith has not replied

Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4228 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 162 of 176 (477043)
07-29-2008 5:36 PM
Reply to: Message 161 by DrJones*
07-28-2008 6:50 PM


Re: Charlton Heston
the ethic groups are similar but the numbers, and concentrations are much different.
i cannot say all that i wish to for fear of taking this thread somewhere else and the abusive way some are allowed to completely abandon rule #10 at will.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 161 by DrJones*, posted 07-28-2008 6:50 PM DrJones* has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 163 by DrJones*, posted 07-29-2008 6:44 PM Artemis Entreri has replied

Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4228 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 164 of 176 (477108)
07-30-2008 10:56 AM
Reply to: Message 163 by DrJones*
07-29-2008 6:44 PM


Re: Charlton Heston
it does if you can read between the lines, though most of us already know the reason why. this little game of beating around the bush is kinda dumb IMO.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 163 by DrJones*, posted 07-29-2008 6:44 PM DrJones* has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 165 by Granny Magda, posted 07-30-2008 11:10 AM Artemis Entreri has replied

Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4228 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 166 of 176 (477123)
07-30-2008 12:20 PM
Reply to: Message 165 by Granny Magda
07-30-2008 11:10 AM


Re: Charlton Heston
Is it because you suspect that you are going to be accused of racism?
oh i garantee it will happen.
If you have the courage to stand by your convictions, let's have out with it.
Just proves that you know the reason as well as i do, nice try on baiting me into this one, but "game recognize game"
Create another thread about this topic, and i will be happy to let you know why. just not here on this thread.
I feel like it is a trap. you get me to say something, call me a racist, and then the admin steps in and i get banned for thread jacking and saying something that is not status quo. sorry im not a message board n00b, and i wont walk into that one

This message is a reply to:
 Message 165 by Granny Magda, posted 07-30-2008 11:10 AM Granny Magda has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 167 by Granny Magda, posted 07-30-2008 12:46 PM Artemis Entreri has replied

Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4228 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 168 of 176 (477131)
07-30-2008 1:10 PM
Reply to: Message 167 by Granny Magda
07-30-2008 12:46 PM


Re: Charlton Heston
Making insinuations and then refusing to back them up is pathetic and childish behaviour. It is no way to conduct debate.
neither is blantantly disreguarding rule #10, but it seems like if you claim to be from the UK you are exempt from following the rules on this site.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 167 by Granny Magda, posted 07-30-2008 12:46 PM Granny Magda has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 170 by Granny Magda, posted 07-30-2008 2:06 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied

Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4228 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 174 of 176 (477155)
07-30-2008 3:44 PM


This may be seen as an absurd question so please excuse me in advance.
Is there any possibility of this thread getting back on topic?
i have been trying to but the haters are here. all this one is doing is trying to call me names and call me out, but he is another subject not up to the challege of creating a new thread. he would rather thread jack here, and break rules. that's why i more often than not try and ignore the crown's subjects.

Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4228 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 175 of 176 (477159)
07-30-2008 3:48 PM
Reply to: Message 173 by Granny Magda
07-30-2008 2:48 PM


Re: Racism
wow you are building quite a resume.
name calling
thread jacking
refusing to acknowledge or follow EVC rules
refusing to stay on topic
and now strawmanning an arguement (though i called this one which is why i remained silent).
told you guys it was a silly trap. this guy is so predictable. he has nothing to add but hate speech and his inability to stay on topic. he is good at putting words into other people's mouths though.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 173 by Granny Magda, posted 07-30-2008 2:48 PM Granny Magda has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024