Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Are Uranium Halos the best evidence of (a) an old earth AND (b) constant physics?
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4215 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 12 of 142 (478580)
08-18-2008 6:05 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by johnfolton
08-18-2008 5:15 AM


Re: Young Earth !!!!!!!
from the first website in message 11
Generally speaking, the target nucleus of the radioisotope(s) to be treated is irradiated by gamma photons of an energy greater than the binding energy of the neutron in the target nucleus. This causes the irradiated nucleus to absorb the gamma rays, thereby placing the nucleus in an excited state. Upon relaxation, the nucleus ejects a neutron through the (gamma, n) reaction, thereby transmuting the element to an isotope of lower atomic mass and shorter half-life.
Using U238 as the source, this process would result in U237, half life of 6.75 days, a beta emitter which becomes Np237 an alpha emitter with a half life of 2.14E6 years (2,140,000) This doesn't accelerate the decay any where near what would be needed to reduce the age of the sun from 5 billion years to 13000 years. As for the same procedure on the infant sun, the only isotopes at this time would have been H1, H2, H3, He3 & He4. Doing the same procedure would produce
: from H1 a neutron which emits a beta to rebecomes H1
H2 becomes H1 stable, H3 becomes H2 stable, He3 becomes He2 Beta plus emiier becomes H2 stable, He4 becomes He3 stable. The only radioactive isitope created is He3 from the almost nonexistant He3 Thus no accelleration of radioactive decay. Figures from Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, edition 87, 2006
Edited by bluescat48, : spelling

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by johnfolton, posted 08-18-2008 5:15 AM johnfolton has not replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4215 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 32 of 142 (478722)
08-19-2008 11:54 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by johnfolton
08-19-2008 10:02 PM


Re: Gamma rays!
Its not evidence of an old earth because one can spin it to be evidence of accelerated decay when you include the entire decay chain.
The time of decay/half life of U238 is 4.47E+9 years The time of decay of the intermediate daughter isotopes is 3.20E+5 years When added together you still have 4.47E+9 years. This accounts for 99.2742% of the uranium. 0.7204% is U235 half life 7.04E+8 years daughter isotopes time of decay 3.25E+4 years total 7.04E+8 since the %tage of 235 is 7/10 of 1% it becomes negligible as to to the change of time thus the total decay time is still 4.47E+9 years. the remaining %is U234 included in the U338 decay as U234 is one of the daughter isotopes of U238.
Edited by bluescat48, : add missing line in post

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by johnfolton, posted 08-19-2008 10:02 PM johnfolton has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024