Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,838 Year: 4,095/9,624 Month: 966/974 Week: 293/286 Day: 14/40 Hour: 3/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The first real intelligent design experiment
AnswersInGenitals
Member (Idle past 178 days)
Posts: 673
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 18 of 30 (478476)
08-15-2008 8:29 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Dr Jack
08-15-2008 4:56 AM


Re: Origin of filtered nutrient properties
Trees, like other plants, are made primarily from sunlight, carbon dioxide and water. Only trace elements and a moderate amount of nitrogen are extracted from the soil.
Even the nitrogen started out as atmospheric nitrogen that was 'fixed' (processed into ammonium and nitrate compounds by soil bacteria). Since you seem to think you know what the heck "filtered properties made of the solid trees" are, perhaps you can explain it to the rest of us. I'm guessing that CD's brain is made from the filtered properties of solid %*^*$(*.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Dr Jack, posted 08-15-2008 4:56 AM Dr Jack has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Dr Jack, posted 08-18-2008 6:10 PM AnswersInGenitals has replied
 Message 26 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 08-28-2008 2:32 PM AnswersInGenitals has not replied

  
AnswersInGenitals
Member (Idle past 178 days)
Posts: 673
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 21 of 30 (478632)
08-18-2008 8:23 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Dr Jack
08-18-2008 6:10 PM


Re: Origin of filtered nutrient properties
I remember reading about an English nobleman who did an experiment in the mid 1700's to test the then common notion that trees do grow from the dust of the earth. He planted a seedling in a large pot of earth and let it grow over several years into a large tree. He then compared the weight of the mature tree to the loss of weight of the soil in the pot and determined that the 'dust of the earth' contributed only a small fraction to the substance of the tree. He (erroneously) concluded that most of the weight of the tree must come from the water that he added at frequent intervals, this being long before CO2 and photosynthesis were discovered. For the life of me I cannot recollect the name of the gentleman, but this was certainly a very advanced scientific experiment for its time, acknowledging the conservation of matter, challenging an hypothesis with empirical evidence, and showing extreme patience and persistence (I think it took about 20 years to grow the tree).
All this might indicate that CD may not be the crispiest fry in the McDonald's bag.
Edited by AnswersInGenitals, : No reason given.
Edited by AnswersInGenitals, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Dr Jack, posted 08-18-2008 6:10 PM Dr Jack has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024