The scientific method is first and foremost observation. You are silently alluding to testability and the false assumption that Creationism-Design to fail in this crucial respect. Of course evolution is not testable in the way that you claim it to be. This is supported by the fact that evolution is an interpretation of evidence. This means evolutionists are running a rigged lottery since the interpretation is not subject falsification----not ever, but it is misrepresented to be just that. The only aspect of evolution that is truly on the table, eligible for falsification, revision, or modification, is causation and tempo. But the explanation or interpretation of evidence in favor of perpetual transmutation producing common ancestry is off the table and not subject to falsification or revision.
You are so far wrong its not even worth discussing.
Is your entire "treatise" going to be done on this level?
Shouldn't you even have some knowledge of how science works if you are purporting to make an argument that affects science?
(And see tagline...)
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
™ Version 4.2
