Did you want me to pick apart your question as you do mine and insist that you rephrase the question using terms more pleasing to me before I answer them?
What question did I pick apart? You became somewhat hostile with me when you accused me of living in a cave after I suggested that most evolutionary biologists do not involve themselves directly with the public understanding of science. I could not believe you'd think contrary, so my question was designed to express my incredulity at this possibility.
It is a side issue, but should you indicate there is disagreement with us on this subject it might make for a new thread in its own right.
But that is what you do when I ask a question; "dust" is the term the Bible uses, so how am I to define "dust" - I am using terms given.
I don't remember asking for a definition of dust. I just asked what does dust have to do with yeast?
I asked a simple question: Don't you think that Creationist and evolutionist share common ground on the point of common ancestor?
According to creationists the creeping things, flying things, and other animals were created separately usually around 6-10k years ago. They do not share common ancestry, they share a common creator. Creationists now argue that the various species today share a common ancestral baramin or 'kind', but that they are not related to other baramin except in the identity of their creators.
Other than the fact that both camps accept the existence of ancestors...what common ground do you think there is?