Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Few Questions For Creationists
obvious Child
Member (Idle past 4141 days)
Posts: 661
Joined: 08-17-2006


Message 9 of 86 (481421)
09-10-2008 8:19 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by mike the wiz
09-10-2008 6:05 PM


Re: A bried opinion
quote:
ou'll find that just as many questions can be fired back, such as the large oversights of dino blood being preserved favouring a younger dino, or stuck in a rut fossils favouring Creationism, as these beasts seem to have preserved in a uber-environment which only existed for them, and not the other creatures. (And there are literally hundreds of species stuck in this uber-environments whereby they don't change morphologically).
If only those statements were true. Too bad they aren't. Dino Blood for instance is hardly what you make it out to be. There are at least 3 threads where showing that the whole creationism claim on dino blood is a giant sham proving that once again YECs are lying POS. As for a rut fossil, that doesn't favor creationism at all. All it does it show that a specimen's fossils were buried between layers. As for morphologically unchanging species, that's again a fraud. For instance, the ceolcanth from the fossils is anatomically different from the ceolcanths that are swimming around today. Even the populations of ceolcanths are different meaning those in the Africa populations are different from the Asian ones.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by mike the wiz, posted 09-10-2008 6:05 PM mike the wiz has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024