Jake22 writes:
quote:
Evidence is not characterized by universality of experience.
Actually, that is precisely what characterises evidence: The fact that it works for everyone. If it only works for you, then it is a subjective experience and not evidence.
The reason science comes up with accurate answers is because it is dependent on the results being replicated by independent experimenters. It isn't a question of "being there." After all, if we claim that the only way to know if something happened is if you are a direct witness, then the entire field of forensics goes right out the window. Instead, the question is whether or not you can duplicate the results. If you can, then you have just shown that the results are consistent with the process.
If your results cannot be duplicated by independent observers, if they are only observable by you, then it isn't evidence.
------------------
Rrhain
WWJD? JWRTFM!