Sounds like he took care of that part. Of course, many people don't accept the Bible, and by doing so they deny the very evidence that you call for. You say it's disingenuous for God to leave us without evidence, and then you do all within your power and beyond to discredit and disregard this very evidence
If the Bible is true, how is it that it can be so easily disproven and refuted? Surely the truth can withstand inquiry?
If you have to accept the Bible without query, without discernment, without putting it under the microscope, how is it at all evidence?
I have been blessed to have experienced God in a very personal and supernatural way, but it was only after I submitted to him.
If the evidence it takes to believe is only accessable/revealed
after you already believe, then it's not evidence for your belief. It's just circular reasoning with faith-based blinders.
Real evidence is objective. Real evidence is convincing no matter what belief you already have - assuming you're of a mind to go with what evidence implies.