Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 40/46 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Problems with Radiometric Dating?
armylngst
Junior Member (Idle past 5695 days)
Posts: 2
Joined: 09-20-2008


Message 37 of 46 (483168)
09-20-2008 1:29 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by Chiroptera
09-19-2008 10:53 AM


Re: Too many assumptions -- yet it works!
I have a question (and it may not sound to scientific since I am not a scientist, but this does bother me). How do scientists know how much radioactive materials that decay was present at the creation (by big bang, by God, by whatever) of the universe next to their byproducts? (That is not to say that the byproducts present came from radioactive decay, just that they match up and an ignorant observer (someone not present at the creation of the universe) could mistake for something that came from radioactive decay.)
NOTE: I do not speak about the present, I speak only about the creation of the universe. In the same way, what about the creation (by whatever means) of the planet earth? Do scientists know exactly what the dispersal of radioactive materials to their counterparts were when the earth came into being? (Once again I do not speak of the creation of rocks and the dispersion of radioactive materials and their decayed counterparts.)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Chiroptera, posted 09-19-2008 10:53 AM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by Coyote, posted 09-20-2008 2:13 PM armylngst has not replied
 Message 39 by RAZD, posted 09-20-2008 2:18 PM armylngst has not replied
 Message 40 by Chiroptera, posted 09-20-2008 2:50 PM armylngst has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024